- #1

- 29

- 1

Any help at all would be terrific...

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter shortydeb
- Start date

In summary: Work has been done in moving from one height to another. This is why gravitational force is not conservative.

- #1

- 29

- 1

Any help at all would be terrific...

Physics news on Phys.org

- #2

- 74

- 0

the rotational kinetic energy is I.(w^2)/2

when I reduces, w increases correspondingly to maintain the above and vice-versa..

- #3

- 291

- 0

When the arms are brought inward we know what is changing: Moment of inertia and Angular Speed

So to show that E is conserved we must look at the equation for rotating E:

KErot = 1/2 * moment of inertia * (angular speed)^2

Now since we know that his A.speed increased we know that his MoI must have decreased by an amount so that if the A.speed doubled then the MoI must have decreased by a factor of 1/4:

KE = [2*(2^2)]/2 = 4

Double the speed:

KE = [1/2*(4^2)]/2 = 4

So 2 (the MoI in the first equation) is multiplied by 1/4 to equal 1/2 when the A.speed is doubled (and squared) and so the total Rotational Kenetic E. is conserved.

- #4

Mentor

- 45,556

- 2,192

Itshortydeb said:It looks like the final total mechanical energy is different from the initial total mechanical energy.

Just because all the forces are internal does not imply that rotational kinetic energy cannot change. It does imply that there's no external torque on the system and thus

- #5

Gold Member

- 9,799

- 253

- #6

- 29

- 1

so if the skater has to do work to bring in his arms, that would mean the force he exerts to do so is nonconservative? My book has the equation W (by nonconservative forces) = (change in KE) + (change in Rot. KE) + (change in PE) . I'm not sure if the nonconservative forces have to be external or not. Would the force the skater exerts to bring in his arms be internal? (Thanks btw!)

- #7

- 414

- 2

shortydeb said:Would the force the skater exerts to bring in his arms be internal? (Thanks btw!)

Yes, the force is internal. Whether a force is internal or not has nothing to do with it being conservative or non-conservative. A force is internal or external depending on the system you consider.

Take the case of a bullet hitting a wooden block. If you consider your bullet as a system, then any force exerted by any other object than the bullet is external. Since the wooden block is not a part of our system, the force exerted by the wooden block is external and hence, there is a net external force on our system and the momentum of our system i.e. the bullet will change. Now, if we consider the bullet + the block to be our system, then the force exerted by the block on the bullet is internal. Hence there is no external force and momentum will not change. This is due to the fact that, if the bullet exerts a force on the block, then the block will exert a equal and opposite force on the bullet as well. Hence, there is no net change in momentum. But here, the momentum of the bullet + block system will remain same, not the bullet or the block alone.

A non-conservative force is a force which does no work in a cycle. Take the case of gravitation. If we take a stone to a height 'h', it's energy will be 'U' [let us take the GPE at h = 0 to be 0]. When it is dropped and it reaches h = 0, just before hitting the ground it's KE will be 'U'. We can again take the stone to a height 'h' and the same amount of energy will build up. As such, we can reclaim the energy in a sense.

Take the case of frictional heating. The energy is not 'destroyed' in any sense, but if we take a block on a frictional surface from s = 0, to s = d then back to s = 0, the work done in this case is twice as that for one trip. Hence, the work done in a cycle is not zero and hence it is not a conservative force.

Also, conservation of momentum always applies in all cases no matter the force being conservative or non-conservative as it follows from Newton's Third Law.

- #8

- 74

- 0

its the other way around - conservative forces do no work around a closed loop. or alternatively, the work done by a conservative force is independant of the path.rohanprabhu said:A non-conservative force is a force which does no work in a cycle. Take the case of gravitation. If we take a stone to a height 'h', it's energy will be 'U' [let us take the GPE at h = 0 to be 0]. When it is dropped and it reaches h = 0, just before hitting the ground it's KE will be 'U'. We can again take the stone to a height 'h' and the same amount of energy will build up. As such, we can reclaim the energy in a sense.

ya, correct. i guess the previous thing was a typos.Take the case of frictional heating. The energy is not 'destroyed' in any sense, but if we take a block on a frictional surface from s = 0, to s = d then back to s = 0, the work done in this case is twice as that for one trip. Hence, the work done in a cycle is not zero and hence it is not a conservative force.

no, it the internal force he exerts is not nonconservative. in general, the work done on a system is given byshortydeb said:so if the skater has to do work to bring in his arms, that would mean the force he exerts to do so is nonconservative? My book has the equation W (by nonconservative forces) = (change in KE) + (change in Rot. KE) + (change in PE) . I'm not sure if the nonconservative forces have to be external or not. Would the force the skater exerts to bring in his arms be internal? (Thanks btw!)

An ice skater spins on a frictionless surface by using their arms and legs to push against the ice, creating a force that causes them to rotate. The lack of friction on the surface allows them to continue spinning without any external forces slowing them down.

On a frictionless surface, the ice skater does not have to overcome the resistance of friction, making it easier for them to spin. Without friction, there is nothing to slow down their rotational motion, allowing them to spin faster and for a longer period of time.

Conservation of angular momentum states that the total angular momentum of a system remains constant unless acted upon by an external torque. In the case of an ice skater spinning on a frictionless surface, the skater's initial angular momentum is conserved due to the lack of external forces, allowing them to continue spinning at a constant rate.

Technically, yes, an ice skater can stop spinning on a frictionless surface. However, it would require them to exert an external force on their body, such as extending their arms to slow down their rotation. Without any external forces acting on them, they would continue spinning indefinitely due to the conservation of angular momentum.

In the absence of friction, an ice skater has less control over their spin. Friction plays a crucial role in allowing the skater to change the direction and speed of their spin. Without it, they must rely on their body movements and external forces, such as air resistance, to control their rotation.

Share:

- Replies
- 9

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 771

- Replies
- 123

- Views
- 4K

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 887

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 761

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 304

- Replies
- 11

- Views
- 5K

- Replies
- 12

- Views
- 4K