If c = A· E, then A - cE = 0.

  • Thread starter Thread starter press
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the equation A - cE = 0 and its implications in vector analysis, particularly regarding the component of vector A along the unit vector E. It is clarified that c represents the projection of A onto E, expressed as c = A·E. The participants explore the geometric interpretation of A - cE, noting that it is perpendicular to both E and cE, which leads to the conclusion that (A - cE)·E = 0. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationships between these vectors and their geometric representation, particularly in the context of right-angled triangles formed by A, A - cE, and cE. Overall, the discussion aims to clarify the derivation and significance of the relationship between these vector components.
press
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let E be any unit vector, that is a vector of norm 1. Let c be the component
of A along E. We saw that c = A·E. Then A - cE is perpendicular to E, and A = A - cE + cE
Then A - cE is also perpendicular to cE ...

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I just can't seem to figure where they got A - cE = 0 from. Everyone just shows A - cE = 0 is true on its own instead of showing if c = A·E, then A - cE = 0* which is what I think the author means by "We saw that c = A·E. Then A - cE is perpendicular to E".

Please, elaborate a little. Thanks.

edit: * if c = A·E, then A - cE · E = 0
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Eh? Where does it say A - cE = 0? Are you trying to prove that A-cE is perpendicular to E?
 
qspeechc said:
Eh? Where does it say A - cE = 0? Are you trying to prove that A-cE is perpendicular to E?

Oh yeah, A - cE . E = 0

My bad.
 
You mean (A-cE)·E=0, I suppose. Geometrically, if E is a unit vector, then is cE not the vector component of A along E? So what is A-cE?

EDIT: heh, I wrote something silly, so I had to delete it
 
Last edited:
qspeechc said:
You mean (A-cE)·E=0, I suppose. Geometrically, if E is a unit vector, then is cE not the vector component of A along E? So what is A-cE?

My book has the picture of this situation. Geometrically it's clear that A-cE is a vector perpendicular to E and cE.

A = A - cE + cE by parallelogram law. But why do we need A = A - cE + cE to see that A-cE is also perpendicular to cE when (A-cE)· E=0 implies (A-cE)· cE=0?

qspeechc said:
(A-cE)·E = (A-A·E·E)·E

Right? What is E·E when E is a unit vector?

E·E = 1.
 
Yeah, that second part I wrote is clearly rubbish, so I deleted it. The scalar product of three vectors is nonsense, because the product of two is a scalar.

A = A - cE + cE because -cE+cE=0. I think the point about A = A - cE + cE is that A = (A - cE) + cE, i.e. the vectors A, (A-cE) and cE form a right-angled triangle, with A as the hypotenuse. This is obvious geometrically, and I don't know what more is required.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top