If E field points up, which way does B field point?

AI Thread Summary
In a classical electromagnetic wave, if the electric field points upward and the wave propagates to the right, the magnetic field will point toward the observer. The confusion arises from varying depictions in textbooks, which can lead to misconceptions. The correct orientation can be determined using the right-hand rule, where the Poynting vector indicates the direction of wave propagation. The author concludes that the magnetic field must indeed point toward the observer, dismissing the opposite depiction as a drafting error. Understanding these vector relationships is crucial for clarity in electromagnetic theory.
Usaf Moji
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
Ok, dumb question, I know. But it's been bugging me, and I can't find a straight answer anywhere, so here it goes:

In a classical electromagnetic wave, where the electric field points upward, will the magentic field point AT me or AWAY from me?

I've seen textbooks depict them both ways - can it really be both ways, or is it just sloppyness on the part of the drafters?

All responses appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the vector definition of the Poynting vector?
 
berkeman said:
What is the vector definition of the Poynting vector?

Ah, I forgot to mention that I'm imagining the electromagnetic wave propagating to our right-hand side. So, I go E cross B with S pointing in the direction of propagation...to answer my own question, the magnetic field must point AT me...and, yes, the opposite depiction in some textbooks must be a drafting error.

Thank you, Berkeman
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top