If gasoline turns from liquid to a high pressure gas

AI Thread Summary
Internal combustion engines can run on hydrogen by utilizing the chemical reaction where hydrogen combusts to form water (H2O). The process involves combustion heat, which converts the hydrogen gas into a high-pressure state, allowing for engine expansion. This expansion generates work, as described by the equation Q=m Cp del T + del (PV). The work done by the engine can be expressed through the integral W= Int (V_int to V_final) P dV, illustrating how pressure-volume changes contribute to engine efficiency. Understanding these principles is crucial for optimizing hydrogen as a fuel source in internal combustion engines.
Qaiphyx
Messages
92
Reaction score
0
in internal combustion engines, how do they run hydrogen in these engines like the BMW hydrogen car when hydrogen combusts into H2O?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Its not about the phase transition but the chemical reaction that makes it work.
 
Combustion heat makes the gas which is introduced into the engine expansion. At that moment the engine generates work. Q=m Cp del T + del (PV). And del (PV) makes work. Ideal work is like this.
W= Int (V_int to V_final) P dV
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top