If I wanted to create a hand crank to spin this dc motor

AI Thread Summary
Creating a hand crank to spin an 18V DC motor from RadioShack at 24,000 RPM is highly challenging and likely impractical without extreme gear ratios. A suggested gear ratio of 1:200 could theoretically achieve this, requiring the crank to be turned at 2 Hz. However, the motor itself is not designed to handle such high RPMs. Alternative methods, such as using compressed air from a hard drive motor, may provide a more feasible solution. Overall, while the idea is intriguing, practical implementation would require careful consideration of resources and safety.
jhendren
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
If I wanted to create a hand crank to spin this dc motor...

I want to create a handcrank to spin a DC motor at 24000 rpm. The DC motor is an 18V hobby motor from radioshack. Is this possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


What is the required torque and size of the shaft?
 


An 18V DC motor from RadioShack can not handle 24,000 RPM. And you couldn't possible crank it that fast without ridiculous gear ratios.
 


Are you talking about a hand-cranked generator to power the motor?
 


jhendren said:
I want to create a handcrank to spin a DC motor at 24000 rpm. The DC motor is an 18V hobby motor from radioshack. Is this possible?

I think that is going to be very difficult. Not impossible, but very difficult depending on your available resources...Do you have a specific application in mind, or is it pure curiosity?
 


a 1:200 gear ration should get you close, assuming you can turn a crank at 2 HZ.
2 turns per second X 200 gear ration = 400 cycles/second X 60 = 24000 cycles per min.
There might be many better and easier ways to do this. A compresses air nozzle on an old hard drive, should get over 400 HZ. (put the thing is some sort of safety cage, as it may come apart.) The hard drive has a built in 12 volt motor.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top