If nuclear forces would be spin independent

GAGS
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
If nuclear forces would be spin independent!

HI all,a question was asked by my teacher that "if nuclear forces would be spin independent then how many types of DEUTRON would be existing and what would be their relative abundances.
Please help
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Well isn't this Homework?

Can you tell us what states of the deutro that exists and then state WHY only these exists, then you are on a good way to answer the first part of the question.
 


Thanks sir for your help,but to understand it i think i have to take one more birth. I am so puzzled because in one topic it is said that states that exist are 3S1
with 3D1 or 1P1 with 3P1. In other topic of discussion while dealing with n-p scattering there is written of singlet and triplet states.
So its better to me sir to leave the topic.
Thanks
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top