If sequence {x} is in l2, does x_n<k/n follow?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jpe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    L2 Sequence
jpe
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose we have a sequence {x} = {x_1, x_2, ...} and we know that \{x\}\in\ell^2, i.e. \sum^\infty x^2_n&lt;\infty. Does it follow that there exists a K>0 such that x_n&lt;K/n for all n?

Homework Equations


The converse is easy, \sum 1/n^2 = \pi^2/6, so there would be a finite upper bound for \sum^\infty x^2_n&lt;\infty.

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm stuck. I cannot think of a counterexample and my hunch is that it's true. I was hoping that maybe from \sum^\infty x^2_n=L for some L I could derive a bound for the elements of the sum involving the summation index, but to no avail so far.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you had something like x_n = 1/\sqrt{n}, there would be no such K, right? Of course \sum x_n^2 doesn't converge in that case, but can you replace enough of the x_n's with 0 to achieve convergence?
 
jpe said:

Homework Statement


Suppose we have a sequence {x} = {x_1, x_2, ...} and we know that \{x\}\in\ell^2, i.e. \sum^\infty x^2_n&lt;\infty. Does it follow that there exists a K>0 such that x_n&lt;K/n for all n?

Homework Equations


The converse is easy, \sum 1/n^2 = \pi^2/6, so there would be a finite upper bound for \sum^\infty x^2_n&lt;\infty.

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm stuck. I cannot think of a counterexample and my hunch is that it's true. I was hoping that maybe from \sum^\infty x^2_n=L for some L I could derive a bound for the elements of the sum involving the summation index, but to no avail so far.

When you think about the p series$$\sum_1^\infty \frac 1 {n^p}$$you know that p=1 is the dividing line between convergence and divergence. So as soon as p > 1 even a little, you get convergence. You might be lulled into thinking that anything bigger than n in the denominator will give convergence because of this. But that is wrong because the series$$\sum_2^\infty \frac 1 {n\ln n}$$also diverges. The logarithm grows so slowly that it doesn't help enough to get convergence.

This is a roundabout way of suggesting that if you are looking for counterexamples right on the edge of convergence-divergence, a judicious use of logarithms in the formula might help.
 
I like jbunnii's suggestion better. Make a lot of terms in your series 0.
 
Yeah, that was a good suggestion indeed, it seems almost trivial now. Let {x} be given by
x_n=1/\sqrt{n} if n=m^2 for some m, 0 else. So we would have x={1,0,0,1/2,0,0,0,0,1/3,0, ...} for the first few terms. Then:
\sum_{n=1}^\infty x_n^2 = \sum_{m=1}^\infty (1/\sqrt{m^2})^2=\sum 1/m^2=\pi^2/6, so x\in\ell^2. However, assume there is a bound x_n\leq K/n for all n. Look at the element with n=(K+1)^2:
x_{(K+1)^2}=1/(K+1)=(K+1)/(K+1)^2&gt;K/(K+1)^2. Thus, K cannot have been a bound. Since K is arbitrary, no such K can exist, and we have found a counterexample!

Thanks for the input guys!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top