If the magnetosphere of Earth disappeared

AI Thread Summary
The disappearance of Earth's magnetosphere would lead to an increase in radiation levels due to solar wind particles not being deflected. While the atmosphere would absorb most particles, there would be a gradual loss of atmospheric gas over time. The magnetosphere does not protect against photon radiation like gamma and x-rays, meaning its absence wouldn't significantly impact those forms of radiation. A hypothetical scenario involving neutralizing the magnetic field with a wire loop is deemed impractical and unlikely to be a serious concern. Overall, while some effects would occur, they are not expected to pose an immediate threat.
Nikitin
Messages
734
Reaction score
27
Would this noticeably increase the radiation level on Earth?

Or would the atmosphere easily stop the excess solar-wind particles which are now not being deflected away?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The particles themselves for the most part would be absorbed by the atmosphere. However we would probably start to have a dramatic increase in amount of gas lost from the atmosphere thanks to the solar wind. (Though still an extremely small amount on our timescale)

I don't think the magnetosphere protects vs photon radiation, such as gamma and x-rays, but I could be wrong.
 
it indeed does not have any effect on electromagnetic radiation.
 
So wrapping a giant loop of wire around the equator and hooking it to a battery to neutralize the Earth's magnetic field would not be on the list of evil genius plot ideas...
 
mrspeedybob said:
So wrapping a giant loop of wire around the equator and hooking it to a battery to neutralize the Earth's magnetic field would not be on the list of evil genius plot ideas...

I don't think we would have to worry about that anyways. :biggrin:
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.

Similar threads

Back
Top