If two spaceships are moving toward each other at the 0,9c

  • Thread starter Thread starter eldrun
  • Start date Start date
eldrun
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I wonder, if we have two spaceship and they are moving tovard each other at the same 0,9c speed. what is the relative speed as seen in the other ship?

if our referance is another motionless ship. i think, ship's 0,9c speed seen ~0,4c and we're seeing they're closing each other, 0,4c speed. (or, am i wrong?)

but, we're sitting the traveling ship. so, what is the other ship's relative speed?

(sorry for my bad english)

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Whatever speed the first ship sees or measures of the second ship is exactly the same speed the second ship will see or measure of the first ship. They can be each other's reference, you don't need a third ship to serve that purpose.
 
Hmm,

i think i found the right equation

v2 = -0,9c
v1 = +0,9c

v2' = (v2-v1) / (1-(v1*v2/c²)

v2' = 0,994475... c

is that right?
 
That's the how fast each of the first two spaceships will approach each other if they are both approaching a third spaceship at 90%c.
 
eldrun said:
Hi,

I wonder, if we have two spaceship and they are moving tovard each other at the same 0,9c speed. what is the relative speed as seen in the other ship?

if our referance is another motionless ship. i think, ship's 0,9c speed seen ~0,4c and we're seeing they're closing each other, 0,4c speed. (or, am i wrong?)

but, we're sitting the traveling ship. so, what is the other ship's relative speed?

(sorry for my bad english)

Thanks.

As a summary (it has been more or less answered already):

- If you see two spaceships moving toward each other, each at a speed (according to you) of 0.9c, then you will measure their closing speed to be 1.8c.
It cannot be otherwise (you can easily check for yourself that this a mathematical necessity).

- The speed with which one spaceship (with its independent measurement system) will measure the other spaceship coming closer:
1.8c / (1 + 0.81) = 0.9945 c

See also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Velocity-addition_formula

Harald

PS welcome to physicsforums:smile:
 
Last edited:
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top