If x1 and x2 solve an LP problem, show that there are

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jamin2112
  • Start date Start date
Jamin2112
Messages
973
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



If x1 and x2 solve the LP problem P, show that there are infinitely many solutions.

Homework Equations



(P): maximize of cTx subject to Axb, x0

(Though the problem doesn't say it, I'm sure we assume x1x2)

The Attempt at a Solution



So it'll suffice to show that Ax1 = Ax2 = sup{Ax | Axb, x0} implies the existence of another x3 = sup{Ax | Axb, x0}. I remember my professor saying something about convex sets (I wasn't taking notes so I can't remember the gist of it). I think I need to choose λ ε (0, 1) and then show that x3 = λx1 + (1 - λ)x2 = sup{Ax | Axb, x0}. How do I do this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Substitute x3 thus defined and check that it satisfies the conditions and that the value of the objective function does not change.

Then, please read up on the theory.
 
voko said:
Substitute x3 thus defined and check that it satisfies the conditions and that the value of the objective function does not change.

Suppose x ε ℝn and y ε ℝn, with xy, solve the linear program. Fix λ ε (0, 1) and set z = λx + (1 - λ)y.

Since xi, yi ≥ 0 for each i ε {1, ..., n}, and since λ, 1 - λ > 0, we have λxi, (1 - λ)yi ≥ 0 and subsequently zi = λxi + (1 - λ)yi ≥ 0 for each i ε {1, ..., n}. Hence z0. Similarly, since λ, 1 - λ < 1 we have have Azb. Hence z is a feasible solution for the LP. To see that cTz is optimal, look at zi = λxi + (1 - λ)yi = λ(xi - yi) + yi. Errrr not sure what to do from here
 
Last edited:
Jamin2112 said:
Suppose x ε ℝn and y ε ℝn, with xy, solve the linear program. Fix λ ε (0, 1) and set z = λx + (1 - λ)y.

Since xi, yi ≥ 0 for each i ε {1, ..., n}, and since λ, 1 - λ > 0, we have λxi, (1 - λ)yi ≥ 0 and subsequently zi = λxi + (1 - λ)yi ≥ 0 for each i ε {1, ..., n}. Hence z0. Similarly, since λ, 1 - λ < 1 we have have Azb. Hence z is a feasible solution for the LP. To see that cTz is optimal, look at zi = λxi + (1 - λ)yi = λ(xi - yi) + yi.


Errrr not sure what to do from here

Plug that into the objective function; mind its linearity.
 
Jamin2112 said:

Homework Statement



If x1 and x2 solve the LP problem P, show that there are infinitely many solutions.

Homework Equations



(P): maximize of cTx subject to Axb, x0

(Though the problem doesn't say it, I'm sure we assume x1x2)

The Attempt at a Solution



So it'll suffice to show that Ax1 = Ax2 = sup{Ax | Axb, x0} implies the existence of another x3 = sup{Ax | Axb, x0}. I remember my professor saying something about convex sets (I wasn't taking notes so I can't remember the gist of it). I think I need to choose λ ε (0, 1) and then show that x3 = λx1 + (1 - λ)x2 = sup{Ax | Axb, x0}. How do I do this?

You cannot assume Ax_1 = Ax_2, because at both x_1 \text{ and } x_2 we can have some rows of Ax being strictly less than the corresponding components of b; and the differences between the right and left-hand sides at those "non-binding" constraints can be different at the two optima. In other words, in the situation you describe we usually have Ax_1 \neq Ax_2. However, you DO both Ax_1 \leq b and Ax_2 \leq b, but with cx_1 = cx_2. Now use convexity in the manner others have suggested.
RGV
 
Prove $$\int\limits_0^{\sqrt2/4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx = \frac{\pi^2}{8}.$$ Let $$I = \int\limits_0^{\sqrt 2 / 4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx. \tag{1}$$ The representation integral of ##\arcsin## is $$\arcsin u = \int\limits_{0}^{1} \frac{\mathrm dt}{\sqrt{1-t^2}}, \qquad 0 \leqslant u \leqslant 1.$$ Plugging identity above into ##(1)## with ##u...
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top