If you wanted to specialize in another subfield

  • Thread starter Thread starter Catria
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the considerations for selecting PhD programs in the field of particle physics, specifically the distinction between theoretical and experimental subfields. The participant highlights Yale as a top choice for aspiring particle experimentalists due to its strong research group, while dismissing WUSTL, Vanderbilt, and Dartmouth for lacking relevant faculty and resources. The mention of a dislike for the Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS) experiment further influences the decision-making process regarding program selection.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of particle physics subfields, specifically theoretical vs. experimental
  • Familiarity with PhD program application processes
  • Knowledge of notable institutions in particle physics research, such as Yale and WUSTL
  • Awareness of key experiments in particle physics, including the CMS
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the particle physics programs at Yale University
  • Explore the faculty and research opportunities at Washington University in St. Louis (WUSTL)
  • Investigate the role of the Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS) in particle physics
  • Examine the differences between theoretical and experimental approaches in particle cosmology
USEFUL FOR

Prospective PhD students in physics, particularly those considering a specialization in particle physics, as well as current students evaluating their program options and career paths.

Catria
Messages
145
Reaction score
4
... what schools would you have considered but didn't? Alternatively, what schools would you have crossed off your list?

This question is addressed to those who once contemplated a different subfield while applying to PhD programs, or those already in a PhD program.

I'll start: if I wanted to become a particle experimentalist (rather than a theoretical particle cosmologist), I would have applied to Yale without fail, and I wouldn't have considered WUSTL, Vanderbilt or Dartmouth at all.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Catria said:
I would have applied to Yale without fail, and I wouldn't have considered WUSTL, Vanderbilt or Dartmouth at all.
Why is that?
 
Yale had what I would want in an experimental particle group, while WUSTL, Dartmouth had no particle experimentalist at all, and I hated CMS (hence no Vanderbilt and no Minnesota either)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K