- #1
rohanprabhu
- 414
- 2
Last edited by a moderator:
jhicks said:The one "science" guy was citing the reason you see a ship's mast and then the rest of the ship as it approaches from the distance being due to the curvature of the Earth I think is incorrect. As I recall, it has to do with the refracting of light near a temperature differential at the ocean's surface.
dawin said:You really believe that temperature differential stuff? I thought everyone know it was because you're only looking at it with the top half of your iris.
ani625: We see with half eye..
Moon is half the size of the sun..
and finally, sun is smaller than the earth..
Pure GOLD!
kru1e:He has a book titled science, its obviously a fact
mrgreenjeans:If he doesn't believe anyone knows how the human eye works, then he shouldn't be wearing glasses.
kru1ee has a book titled science, its obviously a fact
Moonbear said:I kept thinking if he only thinks he sees with half his eye, maybe he should take off the bifocals until he gets the prescription adjusted better.
Yes, I was laughing at the "Science" book too.
Does anyone know the native language in the video to verify if the subtitles are accurate? There seemed to be a lot more words spoken than words in subtitles, but it could have just been the way the language is spoken. Or, it could have been a spoof of some sort. It just seemed so outrageous, that I was wondering if it was some sort of joke/prank type show even. Maybe they set up a professional in a field under the guise of a debate, and then have an actor being so outlandish to see the professional's reaction. Afterall, he may have been lured in under the impression he was going to be interviewed to promote his new elementary school level textbook on Science. (I hope folks can understand I'm sometimes skeptical of YouTube content as a reliable source of translations of TV content. )
This happened after the Attorney General gave the go-ahead to same-sex couples' adoption requests.Shas MK Shlomo Benizri blamed gays Wednesday for the earthquakes that have shaken the region in recent months, telling a Knesset plenum debate on local authorities' earthquake preparedness that government action on homosexuality would do much to prevent the tremors.
Benizri said the government should not make do with reinforcing buildings, but should instead pass less legislation that encourages homosexuality and other "perversions like adoptions by lesbian couples."
hypatia said:I sent this over to a arabic friend who said it is a true translation.
mgb_phys said:On the other hand this could be useful.
The USA is trying to develop an earthquake bomb for use against deep underground bunkers. If the IDF could just arrange a carefully positoned phased array of choreographers/hairdressers then with a carefully timed order they could project an earthquake at a chosen target.
JasonRox said:The Physicists was shot and killed the next day for speaking against the Koran.
ice109 said:what are you trying to say about hairdressers and choreographers?
Huckleberry said:edit - did anyone else notice the science guy referring to evidence gained from spaceships, satellites and shuttles? If spaceships isn't referring to sattelites and shuttles, then what other kind of spaceships is he collecting data from?
We've this reality TV show called "born to dance" (you can guess what it's about), your comment could give birth to a whole new class of conspiracy celebrity gossip.mgb_phys said:The USA is trying to develop an earthquake bomb for use against deep underground bunkers. If the IDF could just arrange a carefully positoned phased array of choreographers/hairdressers then with a carefully timed order they could project an earthquake at a chosen target.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0334754/" - 7.7 user rating on IMDb, I liked it less.mgb_phys said:Ok - it would also work with isreali paratroops http://www.joelonsoftware.com/AboutMe.html Then you would also need a set of sergeants to bark orders like "on the count - camp it up"
ShawnD said:Ha at least I'm not the only person who noticed that. That's like having a cookbook called Food.
_Mayday_ said:Shocking
In the past week I have have been shocked my peoples general lack in knowledge. Firstly a girl taking AS level biology with myself was suprised to find that chocolate had any fat in it. She thought it was just sugar. As much as it may seem I am taking the piss I am not. It hit me hard especially as she wants to be a nutritionist.
ShawnD said:Not all that shocking. When people talk about chocolate, they usually refer to sugar. Diets like Sugar Busters specifically say to avoid chocolate, so you just naturally assume chocolate is sugar. On that same note, a lot of people don't know milk contains a fair amount of protein, because companies sell milk by %fat rather than %protein.
A bit of me always wonders if these zealots are serious. Can they really believe the Earth is flat? In order to think the Earth is flat, they would either need to think the Earth has boundaries like the walls of a cup, or it has no boundaries and the Earth is infinitely big.
ShawnD said:A bit of me always wonders if these zealots are serious. Can they really believe the Earth is flat? In order to think the Earth is flat, they would either need to think the Earth has boundaries like the walls of a cup, or it has no boundaries and the Earth is infinitely big.
Huckleberry said:edit - did anyone else notice the science guy referring to evidence gained from spaceships, satellites and shuttles? If spaceships isn't referring to sattelites and shuttles, then what other kind of spaceships is he collecting data from?
I'll just chalk it up to translation. I suppose you are right. It just struck me as an odd word to use in that discussion.Poop-Loops said:Space probes such as Voyager or Pioneer?
Poop-Loops said:Maybe they just played too much Pac-Man and think that if you go one way for too long, you come out on the other side?