I'm confused about 1st Kepler's law and the 2 body problem

AI Thread Summary
Kepler's first law states that planets orbit the Sun in elliptical paths. In a two-body system, both bodies rotate around their common center of mass, or barycenter, due to gravitational attraction. This motion can be viewed as one body following an elliptical orbit around the other, while both bodies maintain angular momentum conservation. The confusion arises from the perspective of viewing one body as stationary, which clarifies the elliptical nature of the orbit. Understanding this relationship resolves the initial confusion about the motion of satellites and two-body dynamics.
fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,928
Reaction score
272
Hi PF,
According to Kepler's first Law any planet in orbit of the Sun describes an elliptical orbit.
I don't know why I can't go on wikipedia since days. But if I remember well I've seen that when there are 2 bodies like 2 stars for example then the center of mass will remain quiet (since there's no external force) while the 2 bodies would rotate around it.
So I'm confused and don't understand why the motion of a satellite should be an ellipse. Probably due to conservation of angular momentum. But then I don't understand why the 2 bodies are rotating around their barycenter.
Or maybe it's a combination of the 2 situation. I'm all confused. Could you please explain to me what's happening?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any two-body attractive potential problem is equivalent to that of a single body in a central potential V(r) (i.e. independent of angle \theta). Since the potential is spherically symmetric, angular momentum is conserved. Since the original potential is a function of \frac{1}{r_c^2} (where r_c denotes the distance between the centers of mass of the two bodies), all radially bounded trajectories are ellipses. The analysis is quite lengthy and can be found in Goldstein's Classical Mechanics. I think even Landau's Mechanics has a derivation.

EDIT: Ah crap, I messed up my TeX. I'll fix it asap.
 
Last edited:
Thank you covariance. I didn't study this stuff yet and I'll do that in my 3rd year.
If I understood well the 2 bodies are rotating around their center of mass and it's equivalent to say that one of them has an elliptical orbit around the other body.
EDIT : I could enter in wikipedia. Now I visualize it, it's true! I mean if one chose as origin a body then the other body seems to orbit elliptically. While in fact both bodies are rotating around the barycenter of the 2 bodies. Very nice indeed.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Back
Top