I'm having a lot of trouble converting units

  • Thread starter Thread starter a1exander
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Units
AI Thread Summary
Converting units can be challenging, especially with complex problems like converting ft/sec to km/hour. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationships between different units, such as knowing that 1 meter equals 100 centimeters and 1 kilometer equals 1000 meters. A systematic approach is recommended, where one replaces units in a way that allows for cancellation, simplifying the conversion process. For example, converting 10 ft/sec to km/hour involves first converting feet to meters and then adjusting for time. Overall, clarity in unit relationships and careful step-by-step conversions can significantly aid in mastering unit conversion.
a1exander
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
For some reason I can't seem to be able to convert units without getting all mixed up. I can convert feet to inches to cm fine, but I can't convert units in a more complicated problem; for example, converting ft/sec to km/hour. I just get really mixed up and lose track of the numbers.



] I looked at multiple videos on youtube and I get it, but when I look at a problem its like gibberish to me. I know this is really easy math (I mean, I'm in calculus now so it shouldn't even be a problem, multiplying fractions) but I just can't do it. It's like I'm only dyslexic whenever I look at a unit converting problem...anyone have any advice for me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Alexander,

Transforming units is not at all easy, many people have problems with it. I try to explain it on the way it is usual in my place.

Imagine a meter rod, with cm scaling. The length of 1 m is 100 times the length of 1 cm: 1 m is the same as 100 cm, is not it? Whenever you see "m" replace it with "100 cm".

1.243 m = 1.243 (100 cm) = (1.243*100) cm = 124.3 cm.

At the same time 1 cm is one hundredth of 1 m. 1 cm = 0.01 m. If you need to convert cm-s to m, replace cm by (0.01 m).

235 cm = 235 (0.01 m) = (235*0.01) m=2.35 m.

One hour is 3600 seconds. You convert hours to seconds by replacing "hour" by "3600 s" So 0.5 hours = 0.5 (3600 s) = (0.5*3600) s =1800 s.

Velocity is length over time. You have velocity in km/hours and want it in m/s- units. Say v=90 km/hour

1 km =1000 m, 1 hour = 3600 s.

90 km/hour=90 (1000 m) /(3600 s) = 90\frac{1000 m}{3600 s}= \frac{90}{3.6}\frac{m}{s}=25 \frac{m}{s}

When transforming backwards, use that 1 m = 0.001 km and 1 s = (1/3600) hour.

20 m/s = 20 \frac{0.001 km}{\frac{1}{3600}hour} =20*\frac{0.001*3600 km}{hour}=20*3.6 \frac {km}{hour}=72 km/hour.

Now foot. 1 foot = 304.8 mm. You want to convert 10 ft/sec to km/h. (The standard abbreviation of seconds is "s"in the SI system of units)
We do it in two steps, first transforming ft/sec to m/s

You know that 1 m =1000 mm, so 1 mm = 0.001 m. 1 ft = 304.8 mm =304.8* (0.001 m)= (304.8*0.001)m = 0.3048 m. So 10 ft/sec =3.048 m/s. That you can transform to km/hours by replacing "m" with 0.001 km and "s" with (1/3600) hour.

10 ft/sec = 3.048 m/s = 3.048\frac{0.001 km}{\frac{1}{3600}m}=3.048 *3.6 km/hour=10.97 km/hour.

ehild
 
Thanks ehild! I just went over your examples again and again and I think I can do it now! Your way of thinking was different from what i was trying and it helped.

@jobrag- I need to know how to convert without a calculator, but thanks anyway!
 
I am pleased to know that you :cool: understood unit conversion. It is not at all simple!

ehild
 
just remember this... always put the unit you are trying to convert in such a way that it will be canceled out and the unit left will be the one you are looking for..

for example.

we know that 1inch = 2.54cm

if you want to convert 41.5 cm - inch


41.5 cm x \frac{1 inch}{2.54 cm} = \frac{41.5}{2.54} inch

= 16.34 inches.

as you can see... i put cm at the denominator of the conversion factor so it can be canceled and the unit left is inch.


now for another example


m/s - km/hr

1km = 1000m

1 hr = 3600 s


if you want to convert

5 \frac{m}{s} - km/hr


5 \frac{m}{s} x \frac{1km}{1000m} x \frac{3600 s}{1hr}


\frac{5 (3600)}{1000} \frac{km}{hr}

= 18 \frac{km}{hr}

as you can see.. i converted the units one unit at a time.. i deal with meter first... I converted it to km. then after that i converted sec to hr... as you can see also, i put the units in the conversion factor in such a way that you can cancel out the unit you want to convert..

==I hope this helps. == :))
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top