Understanding Angular Displacement in Weakly Damped Harmonic Oscillators

AI Thread Summary
In weakly damped harmonic oscillators driven by sinusoidal forces, the differential equation of motion is expressed as ma + cv + kx = Fe^(iwt). The solution involves angular displacement (y) as a function of angular velocity (w), derived from the equation tan(y) = 2uw / (W^2 - w^2), where W represents the undamped angular velocity. The discussion clarifies that y is not an independent variable but rather a phase shift that relates the driving force to the oscillation. The dependency of angular displacement on angular velocity arises from the nature of the system's response to external forces. Understanding this relationship is crucial for analyzing the dynamics of oscillatory systems.
PsychonautQQ
Messages
781
Reaction score
10
Hey PF. This isn't a homework question and I'm hoping this is the right place to ask it, sorry if it isn't!

In the case of a weakly damped harmonic oscillator driven by a sinusoidal force of the form Fe^(iwt). The form of the differential force equation of motion is then given by ma + cv +kx = Fe^(iwt).

The solution to this equation is given as x=Ae^i(wt-y) where y is angular displacement (analogous to theta). We then solve for v and a and plug the values into the force equation and proceeding to set the real and imaginary parts of said force equation equal to each other and then diving those equations by one another.

The result, using the supstitution of c = 2um where m is mass and u is a variable that scales proportionally to the drag coefficient (which is c), can take the form of giving y ( angular deplacement) as a function of angular velocity (w). The equation looks like this:

tan(y) = 2uw / (W^2 - w^2) where W is the undamped nondriven angular velocity given by the equation (k/m)^(1/2) and w is the angular velocity term from the driven force and solution to the differential equation.

Okay... I hope I explained that well enough.. Hoping someone out there is smart enough to know what I'm talking about even though I don't know what I'm talking about lol...

Anyhoo, my question is with understanding the equation. why is y (angular displacement) dependent on the angular velocity at all? Wouldn't angular displacement be a stand alone variable? The way we derived the equation of angular displacement as a function of angler velocity was having the angular displacement term originally take the form of the initial displacement. Why is this dependent on w!? How is it not a stand alone variable? Sorry if this was really repetitive trying to be as clear as possible.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you denote by ##y## is the phase shift between the driving force and the resultant oscillation. It is not a variable, because it is constant..
 
Oh, duh, thanks.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top