Im not sure if this s the right category but

  • Thread starter Thread starter AlexxAttacks
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the nature of positive charge in quarks and the arbitrary definitions of charge in physics. It explains that protons consist of up and down quarks, which have fractional charges of +2/3 and -1/3, respectively. The concept of what makes a quark positively charged is deemed unknown, as physics describes experimental results rather than underlying reasons. The attraction between negative and positive charges is addressed through quantum field theory, but the fundamental "why" remains unanswered. Ultimately, the assignment of charge values is arbitrary, and changing these definitions would not alter the laws of physics.
AlexxAttacks
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
okk I am sorry if I am in the wrong category but i didnt really know where to post this question.
Ok so what makes positive... positive? I know that atoms are made of nutrons, protons and electrons, and protons are made of up and down quarks which have a positive charge of 2/3 and a negative charge of -1/3... so what makes that quark have a positive property? what is it that attracts negative to positive? how can something only have half a charge? I am sorry if this is something really basic I've just been wondering this a while now and i can't find it anywhere!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
so what makes that quark have a positive property?
That is unknown. The laws of physics just describe the experimental results.
If you just care about positive<->negative: The definition is arbitrary, we could assign "negative" values to up-quarks and "positive" values to electronsm, without changing physics. You could even name them "good charge" and "bad charge", or whatever.
what is it that attracts negative to positive?
Quantum field theory can describe it, but physics cannot answer "why" questions.
how can something only have half a charge?
That is just a matter of definition. You could assign -1 charge to down-quarks, +2 charge to up-quarks and -3 charge to electrons. You would have to change the prefactors of some constants, but physics would stay the same.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top