I'm wondering about the theory behind pulley systems

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the tension in pulley systems, specifically whether the tension between different masses varies. In scenarios with independent rope segments, each segment has its own tension. Conversely, in a system with a single rope segment, there is uniform tension throughout. Understanding these concepts is essential for applying general physics principles. The clarification of tension differences aids in grasping the mechanics of pulley systems.
page123
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
I'm just wondering if the tension between the masses, that is the tension from the string, is different between each mass in the following situations. Like is the T between m1 and m2 different from the T between m2 and m3? Is it for both situations or is the T the same all around in one of the situations? Could you explain this to me? I'm getting different answers from people.

zOnbP.png


xUvzG.png


So yeah, I'm asking this because it will help me apply general physics to my homework but it's not actually a homework question. Just trying to learn the concepts.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Making the usual assumptions of massless ropes and massless & frictionless pulleys:

In your first diagram there are two independent rope segments. Each will have its own tension.

In your second diagram there is a single rope segment and thus a single tension.
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Translational force of a pulley
Replies
27
Views
2K
Why are these pulleys equivalent?
Replies
16
Views
1K
What is the free-body diagram for a massless pulley in free fall?
Replies
31
Views
4K
Pulleys with Strings Having Mass
Replies
4
Views
3K
A simple pulley two mass system
Replies
7
Views
3K
Olympiad dynamics problem with 3 masses and a pulley
Replies
17
Views
2K
1 pulley with mass, 1 mass on the cord, 1 external force, no gravity
Replies
16
Views
3K
Accelerating pulleys (3 pulleys and 3 masses)
Replies
5
Views
2K
Tension in pulley systems Concept help
Replies
5
Views
5K
Newton's Second Law (Pulley Sustem)
Replies
3
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top