Imaginary into real but not vice versa?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aaryan0077
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Imaginary
aaryan0077
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
Its kinda weird (atleast to me) that we can convert imaginary numbers into real, there is just a simple procedure/function called multiplication. You multiply two no. and you get a real ,though negative. But not to worry we can still multiply it with 2 i's or say i^2. To make it positive.
But what about real numbers?
There is no such operation. Yeah, we can surely say that
2 =\frac{\ 2i}{i} but this is not a satisfactory answer.
So why is there a way to imaginary to rela but not vice versa?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
aaryan0077 said:
Its kinda weird (atleast to me) that we can convert imaginary numbers into real, there is just a simple procedure/function called multiplication. You multiply two no. and you get a real ,though negative. But not to worry we can still multiply it with 2 i's or say i^2. To make it positive.
But what about real numbers?
There is no such operation. Yeah, we can surely say that
2 =\frac{\ 2i}{i} but this is not a satisfactory answer.
So why is there a way to imaginary to rela but not vice versa?

Quite simply because fewer laws/restrictions constitute the definition of the complex numbers than the reals, and that all the laws valid for complex numbers are valid for the reals as well.
That is, the reals can be regarded as a subset of the complex numbers, and "producible" from other complex numbers through an operation like multiplication.

Fully analogous is the case with rationals viz. integers with respect to the operation of multiplication:

It is impossible to multiply two integers and get a non-integer fraction, but 3/2*2/3, for example, equals the integer 2.
 
The real numbers are "closed" under the usual arithmetic operations. The complex numbers are also but include the real numbers as a subset.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top