Imaginary Numbers and Properties: A Puzzling Case

[C]alculus
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
-1/1=1/-1
sqrt(-1/1)=sqrt(1/-1)
i/1=1/i
i*(i/1)=i*1/i
i^2/1=i/i
-1/1=1
-1=1 <-- Well my conclusion is that properties don't work with imaginary numbers or did i do something wrong?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Lines 2-to-3 wrong.
Don't bother to post similar riddles at these forums.
 
arildno said:
Lines 2-to-3 wrong.
Don't bother to post similar riddles at these forums.
Why\sqrt\frac x{y}\not =\frac{\sqrt x}{\sqrt y} ??
 
If x and y are both positive real numbers that is true, but not in general for x and y being complex numbers.
 
kntsy said:
Why\sqrt\frac x{y}\not =\frac{\sqrt x}{\sqrt y} ??
To expand on GibZ's comment.
In order to extend the square root operation to work on real&complex number, and not just on the positive reals, you will not be able to retain <i>all</i> properties of the square root operation if you wish it to be self-consistent, and not self-contradictory.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top