Immuno Compromisation: Negative Effects & Living in a Bubble

  • Thread starter Thread starter bioquest
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Immuno-compromised individuals face significant risks, as even harmless bacteria can become life-threatening. Temporary immuno-compromise may allow for protective measures, such as living in a sterile environment, but this is not foolproof. Patients undergoing treatments for conditions like leukemia or myeloma often need to remain in sterile rooms to minimize exposure to infections. The discussion also touches on the role of NFKappaB, questioning whether it is a gene or a protein, although this point is less central to the main concerns about immunity and safety.
bioquest
Messages
319
Reaction score
0
What are the negative effects that could happen to an immuno-compromised person? Could a temporarily immuno-compromised person live in a bubble/sterile room whatever and probably definately be fine?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Is NFKappaB/what made the mice younger a gene or a protein?
 
bioquest said:
What are the negative effects that could happen to an immuno-compromised person? Could a temporarily immuno-compromised person live in a bubble/sterile room whatever and probably definately be fine?

Without immunity, any bacterium that's harmless to a healthy person could potentially kill the immuno-compromised individual.

If temporarily compromised, staying in a bubble could provide protection, but is not guaranteed. I believe most people who had leukemia or myeloma and had undergone treatments that compromised their immunities are required to stay in a sterile room until further notice.
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
9K
Back
Top