1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Impedance matching derivation (next best after complex conjugate method)

  1. Aug 28, 2012 #1
    (This is not a question I was given to solve, it is a question about the course notes.)

    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    In impedance matching, what is the next best method after the complex conjugate method?
    If the source has V_s and Z_s, what should Z_L be?
    V_s, Z_s, and Z_L are in series.

    2. Relevant equations
    The best impedance match is when Z_s = (Z_L)*
    And this was derived from maximum power transfer, or
    P = (I_rms)^2 * R_L = 1/2 * (|V_s|/( |Z_s + Z_L| )) = ...

    3. The attempt at a solution
    The notes say
    Z_L = R = |Z_s|

    This says the next best choice is having Z_L be a resistance equal to the magnitude of Z_s.

    However, from the math I did, this assumes that there cannot be a reactance for Z_L.
    Why this assumption?

    Edit: Why is this the "second-best method"? Why is there the assumption that there is no load reactance?
    (I do not have any criteria either. It is from a handout. I will ask the professor after the 1st day of class, I guess.)
     
    Last edited: Aug 28, 2012
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 28, 2012 #2

    rude man

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    By defintion, |Z_s| is a real quantity, i.e. a resistance, not a complex impedance.

    As to what constitutes "second-best" matching impedance I have no idea. No criterion(a) was/were offered.
     
  4. Aug 28, 2012 #3
    I am aware that this method yields a real number.

    My question is, why is this the second best matching impedance.

    No criteria were offered to me either...

    Anyone with real-world experience?
     
  5. Aug 29, 2012 #4

    rude man

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    OK I think I know.

    What is meant is: if a complex load is not permitted, i.e. if it has to be resistive, then the highest power transfer is when Z_L = R = |Z_s|. And that is correct.

    (Has to be that: otherwise you could just say, OK, let Z_L = R_s - jX_s + ε where Z_s = R_s + jX_s and ε is an arbitrarily small resistance!)

    So: can you proceed with that info? Hint: what is |i|, the current? Then what is power P_L, then how do you determine optimum R_L for max P_L?
     
  6. Aug 29, 2012 #5
    I'm sorry, but that is not what I meant.

    I want to know Why is a complex load not permitted in the second best method? Why is this the second best method?

    I've already done the math showing that this R_L corresponds to maximizing P_L when Z_L is only a resistance, not a reactance.
     
  7. Aug 29, 2012 #6

    rude man

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    There used to be a commercial on TV about a hair dye product that went: "Only your hairdresser knows for sure".

    Only your instructor knows for sure.
     
  8. Aug 29, 2012 #7
    So the bad news: The professor does not remember any more why this is so. :( He said it was just best practices.

    And the better news: He says it may have something to to do with minimizing the reflection coefficient.

    Thoughts?
     
  9. Aug 30, 2012 #8

    rude man

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Can't be that either. You'd get zero reflection coefficient if Z_L = Z_s. So if Z_s is complex, so is Z_L.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Impedance matching derivation (next best after complex conjugate method)
  1. Impedance matching (Replies: 3)

  2. Complex Impedance (Replies: 15)

Loading...