- #1
- 7
- 0
(This is not a question I was given to solve, it is a question about the course notes.)
In impedance matching, what is the next best method after the complex conjugate method?
If the source has V_s and Z_s, what should Z_L be?
V_s, Z_s, and Z_L are in series.
The best impedance match is when Z_s = (Z_L)*
And this was derived from maximum power transfer, or
P = (I_rms)^2 * R_L = 1/2 * (|V_s|/( |Z_s + Z_L| )) = ...
The notes say
Z_L = R = |Z_s|
This says the next best choice is having Z_L be a resistance equal to the magnitude of Z_s.
However, from the math I did, this assumes that there cannot be a reactance for Z_L.
Why this assumption?
Edit: Why is this the "second-best method"? Why is there the assumption that there is no load reactance?
(I do not have any criteria either. It is from a handout. I will ask the professor after the 1st day of class, I guess.)
Homework Statement
In impedance matching, what is the next best method after the complex conjugate method?
If the source has V_s and Z_s, what should Z_L be?
V_s, Z_s, and Z_L are in series.
Homework Equations
The best impedance match is when Z_s = (Z_L)*
And this was derived from maximum power transfer, or
P = (I_rms)^2 * R_L = 1/2 * (|V_s|/( |Z_s + Z_L| )) = ...
The Attempt at a Solution
The notes say
Z_L = R = |Z_s|
This says the next best choice is having Z_L be a resistance equal to the magnitude of Z_s.
However, from the math I did, this assumes that there cannot be a reactance for Z_L.
Why this assumption?
Edit: Why is this the "second-best method"? Why is there the assumption that there is no load reactance?
(I do not have any criteria either. It is from a handout. I will ask the professor after the 1st day of class, I guess.)
Last edited: