Impending Friction vs nonimpending?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CProgWiz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction
AI Thread Summary
Determining impending friction in a system involves understanding the conditions under which static friction applies. In equilibrium equations, static friction can be calculated using the coefficient of static friction only when there is a tendency for motion. A block at rest on a horizontal surface exhibits no impending motion, while the same block on an inclined plane does, indicating a potential for slipping. As the incline increases, the frictional force adjusts to counteract gravitational forces until motion occurs, at which point the coefficient of static friction is replaced by that of kinetic friction. Recognizing these conditions is crucial for solving related problems effectively.
CProgWiz
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

How do you know if friction is impending in a system?

I'm working on some problems, and in textbooks it tells you when you're dealing with equilibrium equations, sometimes you can consider Frictional force = (Us) * Force normal...

Next it says you can only consider that if there is impending motion. Then it says with no apparent impending motion, you can't use this... But it doesn't specify how you would know whether or not it is impending? Many of the problems seem very similar..

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One (obvious) case is:

A block at rest on a horizontal surface has no tendency to move.
But it WILL have a tendency to slide if the same block is on an inclined plane.
 
I think "impending" would mean that something is about to slip.
As soon as it starts to slip, the coefficient of static friction
needs to be replaced by the (smaller) coefficient of moving friction.

As you tilt the block ,as described by grzz, the resisting frictional
force increases to exactly counter the resolved component of
gravitational force along the block. And, of course, the normal (at
right angle) reaction of the slope against the block also lessens -
with an effect on the realisable frictional force.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Back
Top