Implicit differentiation, find y''

apiwowar
Messages
94
Reaction score
0
the problem is to find y'' or d2y / d2x

the equation is y2 = x2

first i found the first derivative dy/dx = 2x / 2y = x / y

then i found the second using the quotient rule and got

y'' = (y - x(dy/dx)) / y2

i plugged in y' into y'' and got

y'' = (y - (x2/y)) / y2

but then I am stuck after that because when i simplify i get
y'' = (y2 - x2) / y3

i don't know how i can plug the original equation back in.

did i go wrong somewhere?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
apiwowar said:
the problem is to find y'' or d2y / d2x

the equation is y2 = x2

first i found the first derivative dy/dx = 2x / 2y = x / y
This looks fine.
apiwowar said:
then i found the second using the quotient rule and got

y'' = (y - x(dy/dx)) / y2


i plugged in y' into y'' and got

y'' = (y - (x2/y)) / y2

but then I am stuck after that because when i simplify i get
y'' = (y2 - x2) / y3
This looks fine, too.
apiwowar said:
i don't know how i can plug the original equation back in.
This above is correct, but can be simplified. If y2 = x2, then y2 - x2 = ?
apiwowar said:
did i go wrong somewhere?
 
Take care, you have to exclude x=y=0.
The original equation is y2=x2. What do you get when you plug that in?

ehild
 
does x2-y2 = 0 or 1?

and the book shows that the answer is 3y/4x2 = 3x / 4y, hows that possible? shouldn't the answer be y'' = ...?
 
apiwowar said:
does x2-y2 = 0 or 1?
If two numbers are equal, then subtracting one from the other leaves zero.
apiwowar said:
and the book shows that the answer is 3y/4x2 = 3x / 4y, hows that possible? shouldn't the answer be y'' = ...?
Yes, they're asking you for y'', so the answer should start with y'' = ...

I don't see how they got 3y/4x2 = 3x / 4y.

Going back to the original problem, you have y2 = x2, which is equivalent to two equations: y = x or y = -x. For the first, y' = 1, and for the second, y' = -1. What do these tell you about y''?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top