Impossable with a pump to suck water from a lake

  • Thread starter Thread starter JBemp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lake Pump Water
AI Thread Summary
A pump cannot effectively suck water from a lake if placed 15 meters above the water due to the limitations of atmospheric pressure and gravity. Pumps do not create suction; instead, they remove air or water already in the line, allowing ambient air pressure to push water up. The maximum height water can be lifted by a pump is approximately 10 meters due to the pressure exerted by the atmosphere, which is about 14.7 psi. This is further illustrated by the mercury barometer, where the height of mercury is significantly greater than that of water due to its density. Therefore, a pump positioned 15 meters above the water level exceeds the practical limits of suction.
JBemp
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hiya
my question is

Why is it impossible with a pump to suck water from a lake if you place the pump 15 meters above the water


I think it has somthing to do with gravity but if anyone could explain it in detail that would be great

Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Well yes the water is held down by gravity.
 


yes but i was thinking what stops me from making a pump so large the i can pump anyways
 


Pumps don't suck. They can only remove the air/water that is already in the line. Then the ambient air pressure pushes the water up. 14.7 psi = 33 feet of water= 10m of water.
 


Have you ever looked at a mercury barometer where the column of mercury is about 760 mm (millimeters) high, with vacuum above the column, and air pressure pushing from the bottom? There is no way that the suction (vacuum) can be made any better. Because the mercury density is 13.6 times higher than water, the absolute max column of water an ideal pump can suck is 760 mm x 13.6 = 10.34 meters (at sea level).
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top