Improper Integrals - Infinite Intervals

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on evaluating the improper integral from e to infinity of the function 25/(x(lnx)^3) dx. The user initially attempted integration by parts but found it unproductive. The correct approach involves using the substitution u = ln(x), which simplifies the evaluation process and leads to a successful resolution of the integral. This method is confirmed as effective by another forum participant.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of improper integrals
  • Familiarity with integration techniques, specifically integration by parts
  • Knowledge of logarithmic functions and their properties
  • Experience with substitution methods in calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of evaluating improper integrals in detail
  • Learn advanced techniques for integration by parts
  • Explore substitution methods in calculus, focusing on logarithmic substitutions
  • Practice evaluating integrals involving logarithmic functions and limits
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, particularly those focusing on improper integrals and integration techniques. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to enhance their understanding of advanced integration methods.

forestmine
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
Improper Integrals -- Infinite Intervals

Homework Statement



Evaluate the integral.

(from e to infinity) ∫(25/x(lnx)^3)dx

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



I know that for evaluating improper integrals, you can take the limit as t approaches infinity of the given integral, but my problem is in evaluating the integral itself.

25 comes out of the integrand, and so I'm left with dx/x(lnx)^3, and this is where I'm confused. I'm guessing integration by parts is necessary to properly evaluate this, but I'm not entirely sure. I tried setting u = (lnx)^-3, which gives me du=-3lnx/x*dx, but then I'm left with dv=xdx, so v=1/2x^2, but based on the solution, I don't believe I'm at all headed in the right direction.

Any help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


forestmine said:
I'm guessing integration by parts is necessary to properly evaluate this,


Use the substitution u=ln(x) instead.


ehild
 


I did exactly that and it works out perfectly.

Thanks a lot!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K