Improving Accuracy in Spring Constant Measurements: Tips and Considerations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Swamifez
  • Start date Start date
Swamifez
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
A student hangs masses on a spring and measures the spring's extension as a function of the applied force in order to find the spring constant k. Her measurements are:

Mass(kg): 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900
Extension (cm): 5.1, 5.5, 5.9, 6.8, 7.4, 7.5, 8.6, 9.4

There is an uncertainty of 0.2 inces in each measurment of the extension. The unccertainity in the masses is neglible. For a perfect string, the extension delta L of the spring will be related to the applied force by the relation kDelta L=F, where F=mg, and Delta L= L-L_0, L_0 is the unstretched length of the spring. Use these data and method of the least squares to find the spring constant k, the unstretched length of the spring L_0, and their uncertainties. Find Chi^2 for the fit and associated probability.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what is Chi^2?
 
Do you know how to do the fit? Just least squares... Write the chi², just by writing down the sum of the squares of the distances from each point to the fitting line. Now, minimize for the fitting parameters.

For the associated probability, you have to put the resulting chi^2 into the appropriate chi^2 distribution... but I don't know yet where your real problem is...
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top