Impulse and Momentum Question: Dont get what Im doing wrong

  • Thread starter Thread starter DLxX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Impulse Momentum
AI Thread Summary
A 64.9 g ball moving at 11.1 m/s is struck by a bat, causing it to reverse direction, but the final speed is unclear. The discussion reveals confusion over calculating impulse and average force, with participants suggesting different methods, including using Newton's second law and impulse formulas. The correct final velocity of the ball is determined to be -11 m/s, reflecting its change in direction after impact. However, the original question lacks sufficient data to definitively calculate the average force, as the final speed of the ball is not explicitly provided. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of understanding impulse and the need for complete information in physics problems.
DLxX
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
A 64.9 g ball moving to the right at 11.1 m/s is struck by a bat causing it to move to the left with a speed of [y] m/s. If the bat and ball are in contact for 0.01683 s, what is the average force in N exerted by the ball on the bat?

Ok for this question I am getting -42.8, but that's wrong. First I find the impulse by using the formula p=mV and then I find the force by using the formula F=P/t.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A speed of [y] ? Do you have the real numerical value for that?

The answer is much simpler actually. It follows from the second law only.
 
Last edited:
Sorry for my first post, I hadnt' realized what you meant.

Then I'll agree with you that it's weird your way doesn't work. But try mine, does it give the same answer?

a_{av} = \frac{\Delta v}{\Delta t}

and then

F_{av} = ma_{av}
 
Yea, there are two ways to go about this problem. Your idea would work. However, you are making a small mistake. The impulse is not simply p, it is delta p. That is,
Impulse = p(final) - p(initial) = m (vf - vi).

Than you can go back to the idea of using F = I/t (I = impulse). I think you should review impulse, because that is a key idea.


As quasar said, you could also simply use Newtons second law. Remember, the force the bat exerts on the ball is the same as the force the ball exerts on the bat (Newtons third law).
 
Parth Dave said:
Yea, there are two ways to go about this problem. Your idea would work. However, you are making a small mistake. The impulse is not simply p, it is delta p. That is,
Impulse = p(final) - p(initial) = m (vf - vi).

Than you can go back to the idea of using F = I/t (I = impulse). I think you should review impulse, because that is a key idea.


As quasar said, you could also simply use Newtons second law. Remember, the force the bat exerts on the ball is the same as the force the ball exerts on the bat (Newtons third law).
Ok I think I understand that, but how do I find the final velocity of the ball?

EDIT: Nevermind I put in -11 as the final velocity and ended up with the right answer. Thx for the help guys.
 
Last edited:
Why is the final velocity -11 ?!
 
quasar987 said:
Why is the final velocity -11 ?!
Well I figured since the ball was traveling @ 11m/s and then got hit by the bat in the opposite direction it would be -11. I entered -11 into the formula and it worked :confused:
 
The question, as stated in the OP, is clearly incomplete. You have to specify [y] to determine the applied force.

There is no reason for the speed of the rebounding ball to be fixed unless some additional constraint is imposed. If I swung the bat harder, surely I can make the ball go faster.

The easiest way to fix to question would be to say that the bat is stationary, and the collision is elastic. But none of this is sated in the question itself.

So, the questions just wrong - insufficient data.
 
Back
Top