Impulse imparted to A by B during collision

AI Thread Summary
In an elastic collision between two objects, A and B, the impulse imparted to A by B is calculated using the principles of momentum and energy conservation. The correct impulse is determined to be -[mA]v, indicating a change in direction for object A after the collision. The discussion emphasizes that for elastic collisions, the total kinetic energy before and after the collision remains constant. Participants clarify that the relationship between the velocities of A and B can be expressed through equations derived from conservation laws. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving problems related to collisions in physics.
tooter555
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Small object A (mass: [m][/A]) is traveling in a linear path on a horizontal surface and collides elastically with small object B ([m][/B]), at rest on the same line, with a speed of v. Friction between the objects and the horizontal surface is negligible.
BICAM14

What is the impulse imparted to A by B during the collision? The positive direction of impulse is defined as the direction of A's velocity before collision.
H8LOF8x

Correct answer is 1.

Homework Equations


Impulse = mdv
v - 0 = [v][/B] - [v][/A]
and maybe [m][/A]v = [m][/B][v][/B] + [m][/A][v][/A]?

The Attempt at a Solution


Isn't the impulse simply -[m][/A]v? Since collision was elastic, change in velocity be v - 0 = v. The direction would be towards the negative because [m][/A] would be moving in the opposite direction after collision.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tooter555 said:

Homework Statement


Small object A (mass: [m][/A]) is traveling in a linear path on a horizontal surface and collides elastically with small object B ([m][/B]), at rest on the same line, with a speed of v. Friction between the objects and the horizontal surface is negligible.

http://imgur.com/BICAM14

What is the impulse imparted to A by B during the collision? The positive direction of impulse is defined as the direction of A's velocity before collision.

http://imgur.com/H8LOF8x

Correct answer is 1.

Homework Equations


Impulse = mdv
v - 0 = [v][/B] - [v][/A]
and maybe [m][/A]v = [m][/B][v][/B] + [m][/A][v][/A]?

The Attempt at a Solution


Isn't the impulse simply -[m][/A]v? Since collision was elastic, change in velocity be v - 0 = v. The direction would be towards the negative because [m][/A] would be moving in the opposite direction after collision.
 
tooter555 said:

The Attempt at a Solution


Isn't the impulse simply -[m][/A]v? Since collision was elastic, change in velocity be v - 0 = v. The direction would be towards the negative because [m][/A] would be moving in the opposite direction after collision.
What does "elastic" mean?
Which of the four relevant velocities is given by "v"?
 
tooter555 said:
Since collision was elastic, change in velocity be v - 0 = v.
You seem to be saying that A is stationary after the collision. That will only be true (for an elastic collision) if the masses are equal.
 
  • Like
Likes scottdave
v is the initial speed of mass A. I think v - 0 = [v][/B] - [v][/A] is correct since the the collision is elastic. And subbing v = [v][/B] - [v][/A] into [m][/A]v = [m][/B][v][/B] + [m][/A][v][/A], I was able to get the answer. Thanks for the advices.
 
If I remember correctly, a perfectly elastic collision means that the total Kinetic Energy after the collision equals the total Kinetic Energy before the collision. You can use this information to create an equation, to help you solve for the unknowns.
 
tooter555 said:
v - 0 = [v][/B] - [v][/A]
Yes. I know this as (a special case of) Newton's Experimental Law. It can be deduced from conservation of momentum+conservation of energy.
The general form involves coefficient of restiturion, for imperfect elasticity.
scottdave said:
total Kinetic Energy after the collision equals the total Kinetic Energy before the collision.
Yes, but using momentum conservation and NEL is equivalent, and avoids quadratics.
 
  • Like
Likes scottdave
haruspex said:
Yes. I know this as (a special case of) Newton's Experimental Law. It can be deduced from conservation of momentum+conservation of energy...using momentum conservation and NEL is equivalent, and avoids quadratics.

Cool. Like I said, it'd been awhile. So I've forgotten about NEL, but I don't think I'll ever forget Conservation of Momentum, and Energy. Yes I do now recall about using the coefficient of restitution, when collision is inelastic.
 
Back
Top