Impulse Matching: Finding the Unit Impulse Response

AI Thread Summary
Finding the unit impulse response of a system involves assuming x(t) = δ(t) with zero initial conditions at t=0^-. The impulse response h(t) includes the system's modes for t ≥ 0^+, leading to the expression h(t) = A δ(t) + modes for t ≥ 0. This formulation accounts for the system's immediate response to the impulse at t=0, represented by a scalar multiple of the Dirac delta function. For t > 0+, the response reflects the system's characteristic oscillations without the delta function itself. Understanding this distinction is crucial for analyzing system behavior following an impulse.
Corneo
Messages
320
Reaction score
0
Impulse Matching

In regards to finding the unit impulse response of a system. We assume that x(t) = \delta (t) and that the intials conditions at t=0^_ are all zero. The impulse response h(t) therefore must consists of the systems's modes for when t \geq 0^+. But why is it that h(t) = A \delta(t) + \text{modes} for t \geq 0?
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
I guess the simplest explanation would be that if the domain of the response is extended to include t = 0 (or 0-) it will have an additional component: the system's response to the impulse while the impulse is being applied, which is of course a scalar multiple of the Dirac delta function.
Since the delta function is non-zero for t = 0- and 0 but not for 0+, the response for t >= 0+ will not involve the delta function at all, just it's residual effect (the system's characteristic oscillations). You will generally only be concerned with the response for t > 0+.
That's what I think it is, but I might be wrong. I appologise for the lack of mathematical rigour in this post.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top