Impulse Matching: Finding the Unit Impulse Response

AI Thread Summary
Finding the unit impulse response of a system involves assuming x(t) = δ(t) with zero initial conditions at t=0^-. The impulse response h(t) includes the system's modes for t ≥ 0^+, leading to the expression h(t) = A δ(t) + modes for t ≥ 0. This formulation accounts for the system's immediate response to the impulse at t=0, represented by a scalar multiple of the Dirac delta function. For t > 0+, the response reflects the system's characteristic oscillations without the delta function itself. Understanding this distinction is crucial for analyzing system behavior following an impulse.
Corneo
Messages
320
Reaction score
0
Impulse Matching

In regards to finding the unit impulse response of a system. We assume that x(t) = \delta (t) and that the intials conditions at t=0^_ are all zero. The impulse response h(t) therefore must consists of the systems's modes for when t \geq 0^+. But why is it that h(t) = A \delta(t) + \text{modes} for t \geq 0?
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
I guess the simplest explanation would be that if the domain of the response is extended to include t = 0 (or 0-) it will have an additional component: the system's response to the impulse while the impulse is being applied, which is of course a scalar multiple of the Dirac delta function.
Since the delta function is non-zero for t = 0- and 0 but not for 0+, the response for t >= 0+ will not involve the delta function at all, just it's residual effect (the system's characteristic oscillations). You will generally only be concerned with the response for t > 0+.
That's what I think it is, but I might be wrong. I appologise for the lack of mathematical rigour in this post.
 
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
Back
Top