Impulse-momentum theorem and kinetic theory of gases

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the impulse-momentum theorem as it applies to gas molecules colliding with container walls. It explains that when a molecule strikes a wall, it experiences a change in momentum, represented by ΔP = -2mv_x, where v_x is the velocity component perpendicular to the wall. The time interval for a molecule to travel to the wall and back is given as 2d/v_x, which is used to calculate the average force during collisions. The key point is that while individual collision times vary, the average momentum transfer over many particles is what matters, simplifying the analysis. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping kinetic theory in gases.
member 392791
Hello,

I am reading through my textbook and cannot wrap this idea around my head yet

Basically, when a molecule hits the wall of the container, it is reflected back.
ΔP = -mv_x -mv_x = -2mv_x = FΔt_collision

Then they say the collision occurs every 2d/v_x because that's the time it takes for the molecule to hit one side of the wall then come back. The time interval for this is Δt.

then they say that the average force over the time interval, and they say the change in momentum for this time interval us te same as that for the short duration of the collsion,

FΔt = -2mv_x

I don't understand why they say the time interval it takes for the molecule to go from one side of the wall to the other side and back is the same as the time interval of the collision.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, that is not said. However, you have many particles, colliding all the time. So you are not interested in the time-dependence of the momentum transfers of a single particle - it is sufficient to calculate its average. And that is ("momentum transfer") / ("time between collisions").
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top