In limits, how do you tell immediately if the only way to solve the

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deathfish
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limits
Deathfish
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
In limits, how do you tell immediately if the only way to solve the problem is to test it out? What are some cases where rewrtiting the equation won't get results?

eg. 0.99, 0.999, 0.9999
 
Physics news on Phys.org


i didn't get you Mr. in limits we just approach a constant or a value closer than the closest possibility... this is the only concept of limits in my view...
 
Hi Deathfish!

Yes, I don't get you either. :confused:

(and welcome to PF, satyasaichand! :smile:)
 


If I am interpreting this correctly, strictly speaking you never can find a limit by "testing it out" (which I interpret to mean writing out "enough" terms to determine by inspection what it converges to). It is quite possible that the sequence is .99, .999, .9999 (1- .1^(n+1) is the general term) for the first, say, million terms then changes to some other rule entirely. You must be able to determine what the general term is.]

(Problems where you are given a finite sequence of numbers and expected to determine the general term are common in mathematics- the ability to recognise a pattern is an important skill in mathematics- but, strictly speaking, they should state that the pattern does not change.)


Assuming that the pattern in .99, .999, .9999, .99999, etc. continues then you can see that it is approaching 1 by 'looking at it', but if you want to prove that, you should rewrite it as 1- .1^{n+1}. Whether or not you can recognise a limit "by inspection" depends on how familiar you are with sequences. It is proving that limit that typically requires writing the general term in some specific form.
 
Back
Top