In SHM , can we have maximum positive acceleration?

AI Thread Summary
In simple harmonic motion (SHM), acceleration is always directed towards the equilibrium position, resulting in negative acceleration when the object is displaced. The maximum acceleration occurs at the maximum displacement and is not zero. The acceleration in SHM follows a harmonic dependence on time, typically represented by sine or cosine functions. Therefore, it is incorrect to state that maximum acceleration is zero in SHM. Understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing motion in SHM accurately.
Physics news on Phys.org
No, the acceleration has a harmonic (sine or cos) dependence of time.
 
O yup :shy:, thank you
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

Why Does Acceleration Decrease When Velocity Increases in SHM?
Replies
9
Views
4K
B Study of SHM of an object attached to a vertical spring
Replies
7
Views
633
B Maximum Force on transom of a boat under acceleration
Replies
6
Views
2K
Simple Harmonic Motion: conceptual idea of angular frequency
Replies
2
Views
2K
Initial Velocity and Changes in SHM Formulae
Replies
4
Views
6K
Simple Harmonic Motion: why sin(wt) instead of sin(t)?
Replies
3
Views
7K
Difference between angular frecuency and velocity pendulum
Replies
5
Views
2K
Simple Harmonic Motion and acceleration
Replies
6
Views
6K
Quick Question about Pendulum Graphs
Replies
8
Views
7K
B Can energy be decomposed?
Replies
2
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top