Why is T = 1/f in Simple Harmonic Motion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter raja.ganguly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shm
AI Thread Summary
In simple harmonic motion, the relationship T = 1/f indicates that the period (T) is the inverse of frequency (f). An object in this motion experiences varying acceleration, leading to different distances covered over time within its amplitude. For example, if T is 10 seconds, the frequency f is 0.1 Hz, meaning one complete oscillation occurs every 10 seconds. Misunderstanding this relationship can lead to incorrect assumptions about equal distances covered in fractional oscillations. The discussion clarifies that frequency and amplitude are distinct concepts, emphasizing the importance of accurately interpreting their definitions.
raja.ganguly
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
An object undergoing simple harmonic motion will always have varying acceleration. That means for each unit of time passing by, different distances will be covered within the bounded amplitude. As an example suppose T= 10s. Therefore, f = 1/T = 0.1 Hz(1/10th of a wavelength). This in a way would be like using the unitary method as-
If time taken for 1 complete oscillation is 10 seconds, then,
Time taken for 1/ 10 oscillation will be 1 second. (Modifying frequency's definition)

which cannot be, since thinking of it in that way would mean the body is covering equal distances of 1/10th of an oscillation every second till one time period of 1 second.

How is this all to be correctly explained ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey, I just figured out the answer... :)
 
Looks like you are mixing frequency with amplitude.
 
No. wasn't mixing the two :p but I get what you mean and your logic. anyways, thanks :)
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'

Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'

Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
View full post »

Thread 'Do electron density waves accompany EM waves in coaxial cables?'

Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
View full post »
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'

Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'

The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
View full post »

Similar threads

Is a Vertically Hung Spring Mass System SHM?
Replies
8
Views
2K
A Equipartition theorem and Coupled harmonic oscillator system
Replies
3
Views
2K
I Find Frequency of Block Oscillation Due to Shear Force
Replies
1
Views
2K
Damped harmonic motion
Replies
3
Views
659
I Question about driven harmonic oscillator
Replies
17
Views
3K
B Is simple harmonic motion also a pure translatory motion?
Replies
21
Views
2K
How to prove that motion is periodic but not simple harmonic?
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
How to know whether motion is simple harmonic motion or not?
Replies
17
Views
3K
Position and acceleration in simple harmonic motion given velocity
Replies
16
Views
1K
Rotating simple harmonic oscillator
Replies
11
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top