In tearing a paper towel or plastic bag

  • Thread starter Thread starter pbody
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Paper Plastic
AI Thread Summary
A sharp jerk when tearing a paper towel or plastic bag is more effective due to the greater acceleration produced, which generates a higher force, facilitating the tear. The discussion highlights that the roll's ability to rotate plays a role in this process, as it allows one piece to accelerate while the rest remain stationary. The concept of inertia is also relevant, as the sudden change in motion causes the material to tear at the perforated edges. The mechanics of tearing involve both force and the dynamics of motion, similar to how passengers react in a moving bus. Understanding these principles clarifies why a quick pull is more successful than a slow one.
pbody
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
1. In tearing a paper towel or plastic bag from a roll, why is a sharp jerk more effective than a slow pull



2. I found this answer online

A quick, sharp jerk means a greater acceleration and a greater acceleration means a greater force. And it is force that tears the paper towel or plastic bag


The Attempt at a Solution



I was thinking not only the force of the jerk like the answer online said but wouldn't it be as well because the roll is ƩF = 0 and the quick acceleration of the one piece while the rest remain unmoved?

I don't know if that is confusing sorry if it is.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is the roll free to rotate?

If so ask yourself why the paper would ever tear?
 
CWatters said:
Is the roll free to rotate?

If so ask yourself why the paper would ever tear?

I am making an assumption saying it is free to rotate, every single one I have encountered is. usually it tears because of the perforated edges. As well as I am assuming that the force and the jerk kind of the theory of the bus - when the bus accelerates you move forward and when it decelerates you move backward. the paper towel that you grabbed in my mind has the same theory its moving at a constant rate with a sudden change.
 
I think the word you are looking for is "Inertia".
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top