Inclined Planes: Heavier Can Go Farther?

AI Thread Summary
When rolling two cans of the same size down a ramp, both will accelerate at the same rate, but their performance on flat land may differ. The heavier can is likely to travel farther due to reduced effects of air resistance, as it has more mass to overcome drag. Rolling resistance, influenced by the can's deformation and internal contents, also plays a role, making predictions complex. If one can is filled with a liquid, internal friction can affect its motion. Overall, while heavier cans may roll farther, various factors must be considered for accurate predictions.
cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3
this might be a dumb question , so if I roll 2 cans down a ramp one heavier than the other one they will obviously accelerate at the same rate but when they get to the flat land
will the heavier one go farther because it has more mass to over come the drag or because it has more kinetic energy or does it have something to do with rolling friction.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi cragar! :smile:

Should be more or less the same …

air resistance depends on surface area, so if the cans are the same size, the heavier one will be slowed less …

rolling resistance (not friction) depends mainly on deformation of the can, and on heat generated by whatever's sloshing around inside it, and that's a bit difficult to predict :redface:
 
so in general the heavier can should roll farther . if it is the same volume.
 
Maybe

I wouldn't bet on it, though. :wink:
 
okay , thanks for your answer .
 
Be careful on selecting the cans. If one can is nearly full of a liquid, like chicken soup, there are internal frictional losses. Also, if one can has most of its mass close to the maximum radius, and the other uniformly distributed, the former would have twice the moment of inertia per unit mass (I/m) of the latter, which will reduce the acceleration rate down the ramp.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top