Incorrect lecture notes relating Bandwidth with speed?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding the relationship between bandwidth and speed in communication systems. Bandwidth is defined as the spectral width of a signal, but lecture notes incorrectly suggest that it directly measures speed. While increasing the rate of data transmission does require more bandwidth, the term "speed" is misleading as it conflates different concepts like rise time and data rate. The participants clarify that higher bandwidth allows for greater throughput, but the terminology used in the notes could be improved for clarity. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for precise definitions in understanding bandwidth and its implications in data transmission.
ericeng
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello PF. Thanks for reading.

My understanding of Bandwidth in the context in which I learn it (Analogue and Digital Communications) is that it is the spectral width of a signal, BW = f[upper] - f[lower].

However, my lecture notes then define 'fundamental limitations' as,

Bandwidth:
- A measure of "speed"
- When a signal changes rapidly with time, the frequency content (or spectrum) extends over a wide range; i.e. has "large bandwidth"
- The faster data is sent, the more bandwidth it uses (is needed)

This confuses me. I don't get how bandwidth is a measure of speed, other than how frequency in general relates to signals in the time domain. Are the bullet points above factually correct?

How rapidly a signal changes with time only determines at which frequency(s) it lies, not the width of the range of frequencies?

I understand how sending data faster could require more bandwidth; by increasing bandwidth, more simultaneous signals could be sent. But to say that increasing the speed of transmission will result in an increase in bandwidth, I just don't understand that.

Insight is most welcome.

Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
- When a signal changes rapidly with time, the frequency content (or spectrum) extends over a wide range; i.e. has "large bandwidth"
This isn't strictly true since a high frequency sinusoid "changes rapidly with time" but its spectral content is limited to a single frequency. It is, however, true for a trapezoidal waveform (which is a common approximation used for digital signals) - as you decrease its rise time, you increase the bandwidth (using your definiton) of the waveform.

- The faster data is sent, the more bandwidth it uses (is needed)
I think its fair to say that higher bandwidth provides for more throughput. I understand "faster" in this context to mean an increase in data transmission rate.

But to say that increasing the speed of transmission will result in an increase in bandwidth, I just don't understand that.
What do you mean by 'speed of transmission'?
 
milesyoung said:
This isn't strictly true since a high frequency sinusoid "changes rapidly with time" but its spectral content is limited to a single frequency. It is, however, true for a trapezoidal waveform (which is a common approximation used for digital signals) - as you decrease its rise time, you increase the bandwidth (using your definiton) of the waveform.

Okay, this I understand. Thanks.
milesyoung said:
I think its fair to say that higher bandwidth provides for more throughput. I understand "faster" in this context to mean an increase in data transmission rate.

So shouldn't this read that the more data sent simultaneously, the more bandwidth is required? Because the data could be being transmitted at the same rate but more data per unit time could result as an increase in bandwidth? ''Speed'' seems like the wrong word here. It's like suggesting "speed" is the cause of faster transmission due to a shorter cable.

milesyoung said:
What do you mean by 'speed of transmission'?

Sorry, by speed I meant rate as you used above, not propagation speed.
 
If I saw those slides/notes, I would just think "speed" was used as a kind of umbrella term for rise time, data transmission rate etc. - just a way to get you to think of "things that move/change fast".

It doesn't strictly make sense but it _is_ presented in quotes ;)
 
Okay, thanks for your replies. I also came across the Shannon-Hartley theorem which defines channel capacity in bits/s. BW goes up, bits/s goes up. Simple!
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top