Increase in frequency of tuning forks

AI Thread Summary
Cutting one prong of a tuning fork increases its frequency because it reduces the effective length of the prong, similar to how shortening a pendulum raises its frequency. The damping forces between the prongs also decrease, contributing to this frequency increase. When an incident wave and its reflected wave superimpose, both standing and progressive waves are present due to differences in amplitude caused by the media's densities. The resulting wave is not a "true" standing wave, as nodes may not have zero amplitude. Overall, the discussion highlights the interplay between wave mechanics and physical alterations to tuning forks.
Amith2006
Messages
416
Reaction score
2
Sir,
1)When one of the prongs of a tuning fork is cut, why does its frequency increase? Is it because the damping forces exerted by the prongs on each other decreases?
2)When an incident wave and its reflected wave superimpose, it is said that both standing waves and progressive waves are present in the medium. Is it true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Amith2006 said:
Sir,
1)When one of the prongs of a tuning fork is cut, why does its frequency increase? Is it because the damping forces exerted by the prongs on each other decreases?

I'd like to believe that waves are set up between the two prongs which are sustained by the vibrations of either prong as they lose energy to the surrounding medium. Damping does play a role yes, but if you cut one prog, you effectively reduce one source of waves. But if OP have a better explanation, then you should trash this one.

2)When an incident wave and its reflected wave superimpose, it is said that both standing waves and progressive waves are present in the medium. Is it true?

Yes in general the incident wave and reflected wave differ in amplitude (this happens because of the difference in densities of the two media) and so the wave generated by their superposition has a traveling wave component in addition to a standing wave component. So it is not a "true" standing wave in the sense that nodes no longer have zero amplitude. You can work this out taking the two wavefunctions

y_{I}(x,t) = A_{I}sin(k_{1}x-\omega t)
y_{R}(x,t) = A_{R}sin(k_{1}x+\omega t)

and adding them (don't worry how the amplitudes are related for now...also don't worry about the phase...just add them).
 
1) Hmm..Not sure about this but I'd say decreasing the length of the prongs would increase the frequency, the same way as decreasing the length of a simple pendulum would increase its frequency .
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top