Increasing the 1 rep max for strength training

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around strategies for increasing the one-repetition maximum (1RM) in strength training, particularly focusing on the relationship between lifting techniques, speed of movement, and the underlying physics and biology involved. Participants explore various training methodologies, including dynamic training and the implications of force and power in lifting.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that increasing the speed of reps with sub-maximal weights could enhance the 1RM, although they express uncertainty about the physics behind this approach.
  • Others argue that the equation E=mc² is irrelevant to strength training, suggesting that kinetic energy might be more applicable but still question its usefulness in this context.
  • A participant mentions that improving the 1RM is more a matter of biology than physics and expresses skepticism about the effectiveness of lifting lighter weights quickly.
  • There is a suggestion that to lift heavy, one must lift heavy weights, with various strategies like periodization and high intensity being recommended.
  • Some participants discuss dynamic training as an effective method for increasing maximum lifts, emphasizing muscle fiber recruitment and the role of the central nervous system.
  • A participant with elite powerlifting experience reflects on the importance of moving heavier weights faster to increase force production, questioning if this aligns with their understanding of physics.
  • Concerns are raised about the effectiveness of dynamic training in overcoming sticking points during lifts, with some advocating for long grinding reps and isometric training as beneficial alternatives.
  • There is a discussion about the efficiency of applying force to the bar during dynamic training and how it relates to momentum, with some participants challenging the views of others regarding the speed of the bar and its impact on performance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the effectiveness of different training methods, particularly regarding dynamic training versus traditional heavy lifting. There is no clear consensus on the best approach to increase the 1RM, and the discussion remains unresolved with competing perspectives on the relationship between speed, force, and maximum load lifted.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various assumptions about the relationship between speed of lifting, force production, and muscle recruitment, but these remain unresolved. The discussion also reflects differing opinions on the relevance of physics concepts to strength training.

ccameron666
Messages
8
Reaction score
1
I am not studying physics so I apologies for my limited knowledge in advance. I felt if I increased speed of reps with sub-maximal weights this increase of speed would increase my 1 rep max using n e=mc2. I'm now not sure as this implies I'm using more energy not applying more force or power. According to basic physics which obviously I have little grasp of how should I be approaching this problem. What am I trying to increase to move most weight for one rep taking into account that a maximal weight will move slowly so their will be a significant time spent exerting energy and force.
Thanks
 
Biology news on Phys.org
ccameron666 said:
I felt if I increased speed of reps with sub-maximal weights this increase of speed would increase my 1 rep max using n e=mc2.
Special relativity (where the equation comes from) has absolutely nothing to do with that.
ccameron666 said:
I'm now not sure as this implies I'm using more energy not applying more force or power.
That does not make sense.
ccameron666 said:
What am I trying to increase to move most weight for one rep taking into account that a maximal weight will move slowly so their will be a significant time spent exerting energy and force.
If you want to move the maximal mass, then go for the maximal mass. Everything else does not make sense.
 
E = mc2 will have nothing to do with this. If you want to talk energy, you can use kinetic energy (1/2mv2), but not sure how that will help you.

I think you're asking: Can I improve my 1 rep max by lifting lighter weights more quickly? This more a question of biology than physics. I would say perhaps a bit, but I don't think it's a useful strategy.
 
Doc Al said:
E = mc2 will have nothing to do with this. If you want to talk energy, you can use kinetic energy (1/2mv2), but not sure how that will help you.

I think you're asking: Can I improve my 1 rep max by lifting lighter weights more quickly? This more a question of biology than physics. I would say perhaps a bit, but I don't think it's a useful strategy.
What is the most important factor for increasing maximum load lifted then? Am I trying to increase force or power and what are the factors for improving them
 
ccameron666 said:
What is the most important factor for increasing maximum load lifted then?
If you want to lift heavy, you must lift heavy. There are various strategies, for example, periodization, high intensity, micro-loading, and so on. I suggest that you talk to a weightlifter/powerlifter, not a physicist!

ccameron666 said:
Am I trying to increase force or power and what are the factors for improving them
Force and power are different things. If lifting heavy is your goal, then it's force generation that you need.
 
What you are attempting is dynamic training. It's one of the most effective ways to increase a max lift. When you lift for speed, you are training your muscle to do a few things. Number one, you are training to use more muscle cells. You are also training them to fire simultaneously. Another over looked point, your cns uses electrical signals to control your muscles. Think of this sort of training as lowering the resistance of the system.

I trained in olympic lifting for a few years and powerlifting for 5. We split our training into technique, dynamic, hypertrophy/ assistance and max effort days.
 
I am infact an elite level powerlifter and understand all of the above trainig protocols. I was speaking to a masters student in strength and conditioning who also competes in Olympic lifting who put the dout in my head about the worth of speed wirk for powerlifting. I am curious of the physics behind the lifting of max loads, just as a piece to the puzzle.

So I'm looking to improve maximum force, mass x acceleration. This is why I thought moving Lower weights faster would help. I'm thinking now to increase force I need to move heavier weights faster, does this make sense or am I still way off
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well, training with heavy weights, encourages an increase of muscle fiber recruitment. However, max effort lifts are usually long and slow. So incorporating speed training, and seeing improvement, usually means that the individual fibers are better able to fire simultaneously. Being a powerlifter, you know the big difference a sticking point will have on your progression. You may be able to lock out a 405 bench but you can't get 415, 3 inches from your chest. Dynamic training helps you blow past sticking points.

Me in the good old days. So, how much you deadlift?

26001_1367332552673_4921327_n.jpg
 
My best deadlift is 290kg

I made this same point about dynamic work helping you break through sticking points using momentum but was told the weight at jax loads is moving too slow for this to be a factor.

I'm now thinking long grinding reps that have me applying high force for prolonged periods may be most beneficial. Perhaps isometric training applying max force into an immovable object would increase max force production.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
Im not going to try and convince you to perform dynamic training. An anonymous voice on the internet will never convince you more persuasively than a master's friend of yours. However, the speed of the bar is not the only reason dynamic training helps with sticking points. When you train for maximum bar speed, your muscles learn to efficiently apply force to the bar in a way that increases momentum. How is this different? Go look at all the wr deadlifts. None of them stagnate in any position with the bar. Your friends argument would leave us to believe that they could increase the weight and perform the movement a little slower. That is not the case.
 
  • #11
This is exactly why I had the debate with him, your making a lot of points that I did. Perhaps on this point his opinion may be misguided. Dynamic work in a supplementary basis does seem to be beneficial along side force production. I've never ran westside though the theory is sounding optimal.
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K