Increasing the volume of solution lowers experimental error?

AI Thread Summary
Increasing the volume of HCl solution in experiments can lead to lower experimental error due to the relationship between absolute and relative uncertainty in measurements. When using the same measuring device, the absolute error remains constant regardless of the volume measured. However, larger volumes result in smaller relative errors, enhancing the accuracy of the results. The discussion emphasizes that while both 50 mL and 100 mL measurements have the same absolute uncertainty, the 100 mL measurements yield a lower relative uncertainty. Thus, using larger volumes can improve the reliability of experimental outcomes.
Macroer
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This was part of a lab i preformed to determine rate law for HCl and Mg.


50 mL of 0.5M, 1M, 1.5M and 2M HCl solutions were made using water and this was used with Mg ribbon to find the rate law. The same 0.5M, 1M, 1.5M, 2M HCl solutions were made in 100mL solution that contained water. I was told that the 100mL solution of HCl diluted in water provided more accurate results, than the 50mL solution of HCl dilluted in water. I was wondering why this is the case?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Don't have that great an idea, but the increased volume of solution provides more surface area for reaction, therefore greater results?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What happens to the relative uncertainty in your volume measurements when you use larger volumes?
(Note this also depends on the absolute uncertainty your measuring device produces. Switching from a 10 mL volumetric pipet to a 1000 mL beaker to measure volume is not advisable!)
 
PhaseShifter said:
What happens to the relative uncertainty in your volume measurements when you use larger volumes?
(Note this also depends on the absolute uncertainty your measuring device produces. Switching from a 10 mL volumetric pipet to a 1000 mL beaker to measure volume is not advisable!)

This wasn't the case as the same measuring device, with the same scale was used in both 50mL and 100mL
 
Macroer said:
This wasn't the case as the same measuring device, with the same scale was used in both 50mL and 100mL

Correct. Now if you measure 50 mL and 100 mL quantities on the same measuring device, the absolute error is the same for both sets of measurements. Which set of measurements will have the smaller relative error and why?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
Back
Top