Index of Refraction: Calculate ni for 10 cm Attenuation

AI Thread Summary
To determine the imaginary part of the index of refraction (ni) for an electromagnetic wave attenuated to 10% of its original intensity over 10 cm, the relationship between intensity and the electric field is crucial. The complex refractive index is expressed as N = n + iκ, where κ represents the imaginary part related to absorption. The intensity of the wave decreases exponentially, which can be derived from the electric field equation in complex notation. By analyzing the change in intensity with distance, the imaginary part of the refractive index can be calculated. Understanding these concepts is essential for analyzing EM wave propagation in absorbing media.
June_cosmo
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Within a certain material, an EM wave with = 1 mm is attenuated to
10% of its original intensity after propagating 10 cm. Determine the imaginary part of the index
of refraction ni

Homework Equations


3. The Attempt at a Solution [/B]
so n_i=\sqrt{\frac{\epsilon\mu}{\epsilon_0\mu_0}}
but I still don't get the imagery part...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
June_cosmo said:

Homework Statement


Within a certain material, an EM wave with = 1 mm is attenuated to
10% of its original intensity after propagating 10 cm. Determine the imaginary part of the index
of refraction ni

Homework Equations


3. The Attempt at a Solution [/B]
so n_i=\sqrt{\frac{\epsilon\mu}{\epsilon_0\mu_0}}
but I still don't get the imagery part...
What have you learned about EM wave propagation in absorbing media?
IN complex notation, the electric field moving in the + x direction and having angular frequency ω is described with the function ##E = E_0 e^{i(\frac{2π}{λ_0}Nx-ωt)}##, where λ0 is the vacuum wavelength and N is the refractive index.
The complex refractive index has both real and imaginary parts, N=n+iκ. Replacing it into the wave formula, you get
E = E_0 e^{i(\frac{2π}{λ_0}(n+iκ)x-ωt)}=E_0 e^{-\frac{2π}{λ_0}κx+i(\frac{2π}{λ_0}nx-ωt)}=\left (E_0 e^{-\frac{2π}{λ_0}κx} \right) e^{i(\frac{2π}{λ_0}nx-ωt)},
which is a wave with exponentially decreasing amplitude.
The intensity is proportional to the square of the magnitude of the electric field I ∝|E|2. From here, you get the change of intensity with the distance and the imaginary part of the refractive index.
 
ehild said:
What have you learned about EM wave propagation in absorbing media?
IN complex notation, the electric field moving in the + x direction and having angular frequency ω is described with the function ##E = E_0 e^{i(\frac{2π}{λ_0}Nx-ωt)}##, where λ0 is the vacuum wavelength and N is the refractive index.
The complex refractive index has both real and imaginary parts, N=n+iκ. Replacing it into the wave formula, you get
E = E_0 e^{i(\frac{2π}{λ_0}(n+iκ)x-ωt)}=E_0 e^{-\frac{2π}{λ_0}κx+i(\frac{2π}{λ_0}nx-ωt)}=\left (E_0 e^{-\frac{2π}{λ_0}κx} \right) e^{i(\frac{2π}{λ_0}nx-ωt)},
which is a wave with exponentially decreasing amplitude.
The intensity is proportional to the square of the magnitude of the electric field I ∝|E|2. From here, you get the change of intensity with the distance and the imaginary part of the refractive index.
Thanks! That is helpful!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top