Induce radioactive decay via electron capture?

captainnemo
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Is it possible to induce decay in a radioactive element by introducing vast amounts of high-energy electrons in the hope that they would be absorbed via electron capture?

I was thinking about how to use up all the reactor waste that the US generates (I live in Washington State, a great dumping site :))...might this be a way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Washington State is not a 'dumping site', but it does have waste accumulation tanks from the nuclear weapons program at the Hanford Reservation, as well as one commercial nuclear plant, which like the others generates HLW in the form of spent fuel and activated corrosion products.

High level waste goes to the Waste Isolation Pilot Project (WIPP) near Carlsbad, NM. How much waste will actually be stored remains to be seen. http://www.wipp.energy.gov/

There is a facility in Idaho at INL (INEL) which takes the spent cores from the navy.

Finally, Yucca Mountain, NV is supposed to be accepting the spent nuclear fuel from US nuclear plants some time (if ever). However, reprocessing is seriously being considered.

As for electron capture, that would impractical due to the energy requirements, and the fact that one would have to deal with subsequent transmutations. Besides, the majority of fission products are beta emitters, so electron capture would have low probablity.

For information on decay modes of radionuclides, see http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/nudat2/reColor.jsp?newColor=dm Zoom 1 gives greatest detail.

Chart of nuclides - http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/nudat2/ .


Transmutation of long-lived isotopes is under consideration in either a subcritical accelerator driven system (ADS) or actinide burner reactor (ABR).
 
Last edited:
captainnemo said:
Hi,

Is it possible to induce decay in a radioactive element by introducing vast amounts of high-energy electrons in the hope that they would be absorbed via electron capture?
It won't work, and would just create more radioactivity, while adding to global warming.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top