1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Induced charge on a plane

  1. Feb 25, 2012 #1
    attachment.php?attachmentid=44393&stc=1&d=1330230514.jpg
    The question itself is easy. E field at 2 is zero. E field at other points are of magnitude [itex]\frac{\eta}{2\epsilon}[/itex]

    But I am arguing with my classmate and tutor that what is the charge induced on the uncharged conductor.

    For me, I simply use the rule induced charge (charge of same magnitude but different sign will be induced) to conclude that the charge density on the bottom of the conductor must be [itex]-\eta[/itex].
    Since it is uncharged, the charge density on the top must be [itex]\eta[/itex].

    But my classmate use Gauss law and obtain that the charge density on the bottom of the conductor is [itex]\frac{-\eta}{2}[/itex].

    My tutor also said that the answer provided by professor is [itex]\frac{-\eta}{2}[/itex].

    So why I cant apply the rule of induced cahrge here?
     

    Attached Files:

    • 1.JPG
      1.JPG
      File size:
      30.5 KB
      Views:
      162
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 25, 2012 #2
    If the charge density on the top of the uncharged conductor was η, the field in region 1 would be η/ε which is not correct.
    The rule of induced charge is applicable to grounded conductors. Here the uncharged conductor is isolated.
     
    Last edited: Feb 26, 2012
  4. Feb 26, 2012 #3
    But it seems my question is a plane.
     
  5. Feb 26, 2012 #4
    Sorry, my mistake. I edited the previous reply.
     
  6. Feb 26, 2012 #5
    Thx a lot
    I understand now
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook