Inductance and Instantaneous Current

AI Thread Summary
To determine the necessary inductance for an inductor connected to a 20.0-Hz sinusoidal power supply with a 50.0-V peak voltage, the instantaneous current must remain below 77.4 mA. The calculated RMS current is approximately 0.0547 A, leading to a minimum reactance of about 913.57 ohms. Using the formula for inductance, the initial calculation yields 7.27 Henry. However, the correct inductance is actually 5.14 Henry, indicating a miscalculation likely due to not using the RMS voltage in the reactance calculation. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using peak values for instantaneous current in such problems.
4Phreal
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An inductor is connected to a 20.0-Hz sinusoidal power supply that produces a 50.0-V peak voltage. What inductance is needed to keep the instantaneous current in the circuit below 77.4 mA?

Homework Equations



X(L)min = V(rms)/I(rms)
I(rms) = I(max)/√2
X(L) = 2pi*f*L

The Attempt at a Solution



I(rms) = 77.4E-3 A / sqrt(2) = 0.0547300649 A
X(L)min = 50 V / 0.0547300649 A = 913.5746527 ohms
L = X(L)/(2pi*f) = 913.5746527 ohms / 2 / pi / 20 Hz = 7.27 Henry

But the answer is actually 5.14 Henry and I can't figure out why. Where did I go wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem speaks about the instantaneous current value, so you'll want to deal with peak values rather than RMS ones.
 
Or, equivalently, you didn't use the rms voltage when you calculated the reactance.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
900
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top