Induction and anguler momentum

  • Thread starter Thread starter daniel_i_l
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction Momentum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between electromagnetic fields and angular momentum conservation. It begins with a scenario involving a coil and charged balls, questioning whether stopping the current contradicts angular momentum conservation. Participants clarify that the electromagnetic (EM) field possesses its own angular momentum, which can transform into mechanical angular momentum when the current ceases. The conversation also touches on how to define and derive angular momentum density in the EM field, referencing established physics texts for further understanding. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes the importance of considering the momentum of the EM field in the context of angular momentum conservation.
daniel_i_l
Gold Member
Messages
864
Reaction score
0
Lets say you have a plastic plate with little charged balls around the edge. in the middle there's a coil with a current going through. now if the current is suddenly stopped then there's a change in the magnetic flux through the plate so as a result there should be an electric field circulating around the plate. this would push the balls and the plate would spin. but doesn't this contridict AM conservation. could the answer be that the new electric field produces a new magnetic field which induces another EF in the opposite direction so the plate doesn't spin?
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Haven't thought right through your example, but you don't seem to consider the momentum of the field at all..
 
I don't think angular momentum is conserved in electromagnetism. Since the basic argument of central forces when deriving conservation of angular momentum is not valid any more (Lorenz force).
 
tim_lou said:
I don't think angular momentum is conserved in electromagnetism. Since the basic argument of central forces when deriving conservation of angular momentum is not valid any more (Lorenz force).

That's not correct: the EM field has a well-defined angular momentum. The question by the OP is in fact a question (I don't know if he took it from there) in Feynman's lectures (vol II).
What happens indeed, is that the angular momentum of the EM field is transformed (the EM field going to zero) into mechanical angular momentum.
 
Ok, so basically the final mechanical angular momentum comes from the initial AM in the coil?
Thanks.
 
daniel_i_l said:
Ok, so basically the final mechanical angular momentum comes from the initial AM in the coil?
Thanks.

Not so much the coil itself, than the EM field generated by the current in the coil, which has angular momentum (like it has energy).
 
So, the field has angular momentum? how would that angular momentum be defined? I'm curious to know how one would derive conservation of angular momentum with electromagnetic field... I hope it is not too difficult for a student who just finished calc III.
 
The angular momentum density (angular momentum per unit volume of the field) at position \vec r relative to the desired "axis of rotation" is

\vec L = \vec r \times \vec P

where \vec P in turn is the linear momentum density

\vec P = \frac{1}{4 \pi c} \vec E \times \vec B

also known as the Poynting vector. These are in cgs units because I took them from this Wikipedia article:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon_polarization

You can probably find the MKS versions in Griffiths and other books but I'm at home and my textbooks are at the office. The only difference would be in constant factors.

Griffiths has a whole chapter on the energy and momentum density in the electromagnetic field, but I don't remember if he covers the angular momentum density also.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top