Induction motor fed from rotor.

AI Thread Summary
Feeding an induction motor from the rotor side using slip rings can enable the rotor to rotate when supplied with a frequency, such as 50Hz. The rotor's direction of rotation will align with the effective magnetic field created by the stator. However, this setup requires slip rings, which are prone to wear and can complicate maintenance. Additionally, powering the rotor shifts I2R losses to the armature, making cooling more challenging. The discussion also mentions the use of small unibearing induction motors with a wound stator inside a hollow rotor, highlighting an alternative design.
ajith.mk91
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
What will happen if an induction motor is fed from rotor side. I mean if i supply say 50HZ frequency supply to rotor through slip rings and have my stator windings connected to variable resistances will the rotor start to rotate and if it does in which direction?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The beauty of a normal induction motor is that the rotor is unpowered, and slip rings are not required. These are usually the components, besides bearings, that wear out first. The other important feature is that they are quasi-synchronous.

If the rotor is now powered, slip rings will be required. If you have a 3-phase armature with windings and with 3 slip rings, the rotor will turn in whichever direction the effective magnetic field in the stator is quasi-stationary. Do not forget to use a squirrel cage in the stator, as well as use thin laminated steel in the magnetic circuit. Another problem here is that now the I2R coil losses are now in the armature, not the stator, and the armature is harder to cool.

I have seen small unibearing induction motors (I think maybe shaded pole) where the wound stator is inside a hollow rotor (with squirrel cage). The unibearing (probably sleeve) and output shaft are only at one end.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Back
Top