Induction motor starting direction

AI Thread Summary
Induction motors start in a consistent direction due to the phase difference between the start and run windings, which creates a directional torque. The start winding induces a magnetic field that positions the north pole at 12:00 o'clock, while the run winding peaks later, creating a south pole at 3:00 o'clock and a north pole at 9:00. This configuration ensures that the motor rotates clockwise each time it starts. The interaction between the windings establishes a directional bias essential for consistent operation. Understanding this mechanism clarifies why induction motors have a predictable starting direction.
John94N
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I have a question on induction motor starting direction. I understand the phase delay between the running winding and starting winding, but I don’t see why an induction motor should start in the same direction each time. Is there a directional bias on the stator or rotor coils that ensures the torque is always in one direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The bias is obtained from the start winding used in conjunction with the run winding to start the motor.

Let's say the start winding induces a magnetic field in the armature so the north pole is at 12:00 o'clock. After a delay, the run winding peaks with it's south pole at 3:00 o'clock and north pole at 9:00. This will induce the armature to rotate clockwise.
 
That's makes sense. Thanks.
 
You're welcome. Glad to help.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top