Induction of Complementary Sets

  • Thread starter Thread starter rbzima
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction Sets
AI Thread Summary
Induction can be applied to demonstrate that the complement of the union of sets is equivalent to the intersection of their complements. The base case involves verifying the statement for two sets, which simplifies the process. Once established for two sets, it can be extended to n+1 sets by treating them as the union of one set with n sets. The complement of this union then leads to the intersection of the complement of the first set with the intersection of the complements of the remaining sets. This method effectively proves the original statement through induction.
rbzima
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
I'm just wondering how induction can be used to show the following:

(A_1 \bigcup A_2 \bigcup A_3 \bigcup \cdots \bigcup A_n)^c = A^c_1 \bigcap A^c_2 \bigcap A^c_3 \bigcap \cdots \bigcap A^c_n
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What's the base case? Did you try to establish whether a case follows if the previous is true (if the complement of the union of k sets is equivalent to the intersection of their respective complements, does this imply the same for k + 1 sets?).
 
Once you show it for two sets, it is easy. n+1 sets can be considered as 1 set union with n sets. Complement this gives then the complement of 1 set intersected with the complement of the union of n sets.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top