Inductive reactance – Circular loop with N lambda standing wave

AI Thread Summary
Evaluating the inductive reactance of a circular loop when the wavelength of the applied signal is significantly shorter than the loop's length poses challenges, particularly when the wavelength is an even multiple of the loop diameter and part of a parallel resonant circuit. Traditional methods for calculating inductance and reactance rely on assumptions that do not hold in this scenario, as the loop cannot be treated as a lumped element. Instead, wave propagation around the loop must be analyzed using advanced electromagnetic modeling tools like HFSS or FEKO. This shift from circuit parameters to transmission coefficients complicates the analysis, highlighting the complexities of microwave electronics compared to low-frequency systems. A fundamental method for calculating inductance in these cases remains elusive.
Sandgroper
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Has anyone come across, or may be able to point me in the direction of a method for evaluating the inductive reactance of a circular loop when the wavelength of the applied signal is significantly less than the conductor length of the loop - and more particularly when;

A. The driven wavelength is an even whole multiple of the loop diameter, and
B. The loop forms part of a ‘long’ leg in a parallel resonant circuit carrying a standing wave?

Inductive reactance is well understood to be a vector function of dPhi/dt and can be readily calculated and observed for parallel conductors, single loop and multi loop coils through to odd shaped coils thanks to Msrs Wheeler et. al. etc. Common to all approaches I have come across is that the applied wavelength is significantly less than the conductor length of the coil (Actually the wavelength << conductor length is implicit in the formulas). The literature suggests that as the geometry of a coil increases the inductance, and hence the inductive reactance approach infinity - this to me seems to be predicated on the assumption that the wavelength of the applied signal is significantly less than the guided path.

I can not find a generic or fundamental method of calculating inductance/reactance for cases where the wavelength is significantly shorter than the loop/coil/conductor/guide length.

Any help will be greatly appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The concept of inductance is no longer valid because the loop cannot be considered as a single "lumped element" or device. You need to solve for wave propagation on and around the loop, which is usually done using an electromagnetics modeling code such as HFSS or FEKO. Circuit parameters such as inductance or capacitance are replaced by transmission and reflection coefficients, scattering parameters, etc. This is why microwave electronics is so much more complicated than low-frequency electronics.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top