Inductor behavior connected directly to DC (no resistor)?

AI Thread Summary
When an ideal inductor is connected directly to a DC voltage source, it behaves like a short-circuit at time t=0 because it starts with zero current and ramps up linearly, building a magnetic field. The voltage across the inductor is related to the rate of change of current (di/dt), but at the moment of connection, the inductor does not oppose the initial current spike as it is not an open circuit. The confusion arises from misunderstanding the nature of inductors; they do not instantaneously block current but instead allow it to increase gradually. In practical scenarios, real inductors have series resistance that limits current, but the ideal case assumes no resistance. Thus, the inductor's behavior at t=0 is characterized by its ability to allow current to flow while establishing a magnetic field.
ME77
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If an ideal inductor is connected directly (no resistor present) to a DC voltage source, why does it behave like a short-circuit at time t=0? If voltage across an inductor is related to the change in current (i.e. di/dt), then shouldn't the voltage across the inductor be very large at time t=0 because the current goes from zero to some value instantaneously (assume no resistor is series). This would imply that the inductor should act like an open-circuit at time t=0. Wouldn't the inductor oppose the initial current spike and prevent the initial current from flowing? I know that this is not true; however, I am trying to determine why not.

Thanks for your help.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
ME77 said:
If an ideal inductor is connected directly (no resistor present) to a DC voltage source, why does it behave like a short-circuit at time t=0? If voltage across an inductor is related to the change in current (i.e. di/dt), then shouldn't the voltage across the inductor be very large at time t=0 because the current goes from zero to some value instantaneously (assume no resistor is series). This would imply that the inductor should act like an open-circuit at time t=0. Wouldn't the inductor oppose the initial current spike and prevent the initial current from flowing? I know that this is not true; however, I am trying to determine why not.

Thanks for your help.

It is neither a short nor an open. Can you write the equation that relates the current through the inductor to the voltage across it?
 
berkeman said:
It is neither a short nor an open. Can you write the equation that relates the current through the inductor to the voltage across it?

berkeman - The equation is I(t) = Vc/R * (1-e^(-t*L/R)). Using the equation, I understand that the current becomes infinity (or indeterminate) when R=0. However, I am trying to understand what physically is happening. If R=0, does a magnetic field still form when current flows through an ideal conductor? Thanks.
 
ME77 said:
berkeman - The equation is I(t) = Vc/R * (1-e^(-t*L/R)). Using the equation, I understand that the current becomes infinity (or indeterminate) when R=0. However, I am trying to understand what physically is happening. If R=0, does a magnetic field still form when current flows through an ideal conductor? Thanks.

I had a more fundamental equation in mind:

v(t) = L \frac{di(t)}{dt}

That's the way I think about inductors. What happens when you apply a step voltage across an inductor?

BTW -- the current through the ideal inductor only becomes infinite in infinite time. It is a linear ramp from t=0 to whenever. And with real inductors, the current is limited by the inductor's series resistance (check the datasheets for this number) and the source voltage.
 
ME77 said:
This would imply that the inductor should act like an open-circuit at time t=0. Wouldn't the inductor oppose the initial current spike and prevent the initial current from flowing? I know that this is not true; however, I am trying to determine why not.

It is true and your thoughts to the contrary are incorrect. Why do you think the ideal inductor conducts at t=0? It starts with 0 current and ramps linearly while building a magnetic field.

What caused your mixup?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Note to participants in this thread: please don't over-complicate the issue. The focus here is on an ideal inductor.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Back
Top