Inelastic Collision and kinetic energy?

AI Thread Summary
In an inelastic collision, such as two pieces of taffy colliding and sticking together, momentum is conserved while kinetic energy is not, as some energy is converted into heat. The discussion highlights the need to calculate the kinetic energy before and after the collision to determine the percentage lost to heat. When considering a scenario where one piece of taffy is twice as massive, the final velocity will differ, affecting the kinetic energy calculations. Participants are encouraged to reference their textbooks or online resources to better understand the principles of inelastic collisions and how to derive final velocities from initial conditions. Ultimately, the focus is on understanding the relationship between mass, velocity, and energy loss in these types of collisions.
tvshonk
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A piece of taffy slams into and sticks to another identical piece of taffy that is at rest. The momentum of the two pieces stuck together after the collision is the same as it was before the collision, but this is not true of the kinetic energy, which is partly turned into heat. What percentage of the kinetic energy is turned into heat?

(my own addition) What if the initial piece of taffy was twice as massive as the one at rest when it collided?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Something with the equation for kinetic energy? Or is it conservation of momentum because of twice the mass and the same velocity? Not sure how the second relates to loss of energy for friction.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
They're asking about kinetic energy being turned into heat. If some of it is turned into heat then that portion will no longer be contributing to the (bulk) motion of the system.

You have a perfectly inelastic collision. What's conserved? What's the KE before and the KE after collision?
 
Well, the KE isn't conserved since it's lost to heat... but momentum has to be conserved, but I don't see how the equation for that would lead to KE if I just figure out the mass and velocity changes.

If they were the same, but double the mass in the second case... velocity would have to change? And with mv I could find the KE?
 
Last edited:
tvshonk said:
Well, the KE isn't conserved since it's lost to heat... but momentum has to be conserved, but I don't see how the equation for that would lead to KE if I just figure out the mass and velocity changes.
Look in your text, class notes, or on the web to investigate "inelastic collision". How do you determine the final velocity giving the initial masses and velocities of the colliding bodies?
If they were the same, but double the mass in the second case... velocity would have to change? And with mv I could find the KE?
Sure. You know the mass, so if you know mv you can find v, right? What's the expression for KE?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top